A bivalent dissectional analysis of the high-affinity interactions between Cdc42 and the Cdc42/Rac interactive binding domains of signaling kinases in Candida albicans.

Zhengding Su,Michael J Osborne,Ping Xu,Xiaolong Xu,Yang Li,Feng Ni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi050846l
IF: 3.321
2005-01-01
Biochemistry
Abstract:The small GTPase Cdc42, a member of the highly conserved Rho family of intracellular GTPases, communicates with downstream signaling proteins via high-affinity interactions with the consensus Cdc42/Rac interactive binding (CRIB) polypeptide sequence. Previous biochemical and structural studies show that the CRIB motif itself is insufficient for high-affinity binding to Cdc42 but requires the sequence segment C-terminal to the CRIB motif for enhanced affinity. In this Study, we have investigated the high-affinity (K-d in units of nanomolar) associations of two highly homologous extended CRIB domains (eCRIBs) from the PAK kinases, Cla4 and Cst20, with Cdc42 from Candida albicans. H-1-N-15 NMR heteronuclear NOE data of the eCRIB polypeptides in complex with Candida Cdc42 (CaCdc42) indicate that both eCRIB peptides have approximately two binding loci for CaCdc42. When each of the two eCRIB peptides is dissected into two fragments, the N-terminal fragments containing the minimal CRIB motif (mCRIB), mCla4 and mCst20, have relatively high binding affinities with dissociation constants (K-d) of 4.2 and 0.43 mu M, respectively. Oil the other hand, the C-terminal fragments (cCRIB), cCla4 and cCst20, exhibit significantly lower affinities for their binding to CaCdc42. The cCla4 peptide binds to CaCdc42 with a sub-millimolar K-d of 275 mu M, and the cCst20 peptide shows an even lower binding affinity (K-d = 1160 mu M). Cross-titration experiments with the cognate fragments show that the binding affinity of cCst20 is enhanced similar to 5.5-fold (K-d = 207 PM) in the presence of saturating amounts of mCst20, and vice versa. No such effect is observed for the binding of cCla4 and mCla4. These results suggest that the Cdc42-CRIB system call be represented by a "dual recognition" model for protein-protein interactions [Kleanthous, C., et al. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 28, 227-233], following much the same mechanisms of multivalent molecular interactions [Song, J., and Ni, F. (1998) Biochem. Cell Biol. 76, 177-188; Mammen, M., et al. (1998) Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 37, 2754-2794]. The bivalent modeling of linked peptide fragments shows that the binding of eCla4 follows a simple additivity/avidity model, while binding of eCst20 appears to have a more complex mechanism involving cooperative effects. The differential binding mechanisms between closely related eCRIB polypeptides and CaCdc42 provide a new molecular basis for understanding kinase activation and for the design of antifungal agents targeting the large protein interaction interfaces engaged by the fungal GTPase.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?