[The Combined Effect of Isoniazid and Rifampicin on the Activities of CYP4501A2 and CYP4503A4 in Primary Hepatocytes from Healthy Human Adults].

Zhen-wei Liu,Zhuo-han Hu,Ying-yun Cai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:1001-0939.2005.11.015
2005-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To study the combined effect of isoniazid and rifampicin on the activities of CYP1A2 and 3A4 in primary hepatocytes from healthy human adults. METHODS The primary hepatocytes were isolated from adult healthy human livers, and cultured for 3 days. Then the cells were divided into 15 groups including two negative control groups (culture media alone) and 13 drug intervention groups, to which the following drugs were added: isoniazid (25 micromol/L, 50 micromol/L), rifampicin (12.5 micromol/L, 25 micromol/L) or both of them with different concentrations (CYP 1A2: rifampicin 12.5 micromol/L + isoniazid 50 micromol/L, rifampicin 25 micromol/L + isoniazid 50 micromol/L; CYP3A4: rifampicin 12.5 micromol/L + isoniazid 50 micromol/L, rifampicin 25 micromol/L + isoniazid 25 micromol/L, rifampicin 25 micromol/L + isoniazid 50 micromol/L) respectively. All the concentrations were consistent with the range of maximum clinical blood concentrations. After culture for 2 days, substrates (phenacetin for CYP1A2 , testosterone for CYP3A4) were added, and then the peak area (unit: mAU. min) of their metabolites was measured with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to assess the activities of CYP450 1A2 and 3A4. RESULTS (1) The activity of CYP1A2 in isoniazid groups with concentrations of 25 micromol/L and 50 micromol/L was (3.33 +/- 0.65), (3.03 +/- 0.38) mAU.min respectively, significantly different compared with that in the negative control group [(5.23 +/- 0.31) mAU.min, P < 0.01]. The activity of CYP450 1A2 in rifampicin groups with a concentration of 12.5 micromol/L was (6.07 +/- 0.55) mAU.min, which had significant difference compared with that in the negative control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference of CYP1A2 activity between rifampicin with 25 micromol/L [(4.93 +/- 0.57) mAU.min] and the negative control group (P > 0.05). The activity of CYP1A2 of groups with two kinds of different concentrations of isoniazid and rifampicin combined groups was (3.27 +/- 0.96), (3.97 +/- 0.25) mAU.min respectively, which had significant difference compared with that in the negative control group (P < 0.05). (2) The activity of CYP3A4 in isoniazid groups with concentrations of 25 micromol/L and 50 micromol/L was (5.40 +/- 1.35), (2.63 +/- 0.06) mAU.min respectively, which had significant difference compared with that in the negative control group [(12.53 +/- 0.51) mAU.min, P < 0.01]. The activity of CYP3A4 in rifampicin groups with concentrations of 12.5 micromol/L and 25 micromol/L was (165.17 +/- 11.47), (120.20 +/- 15.73) mAU.min respectively, which had significant difference compared with that in the negative control group (P < 0.01). The activity of CYP3A4 in the three isoniazid and rifampicin combined groups with three kinds of different concentrations was (118.37 +/- 8.90), (77.53 +/- 6.91), (68.73 +/- 4.72) mAU.min respectively, which had significant difference compared with that in the negative control group (P < 0.01), but they were lower than those in rifampicin groups with corresponding concentrations (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Isoniazid and rifampicin in the range of maximum clinical blood concentration have no significant inducing or inhibiting effect on the activity of CYP1A2 of healthy adult human primary hepatocytes. Isoniazid in the range of maximum clinical blood concentration can inhibit the activity of CYP3A4, while rifampicin can induce the activity of CYP3A4; the combined effect of isoniazid and rifampicin being the induction of CYP3A4 activity, but the inducing effect was less than that of rifampicin alone with the same concentration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?