Expression pattern shifts following duplication indicative of subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization in regulatory genes of Arabidopsis.

Jill M. Duarte,Liying Cui,P. Kerr Wall,Qing Zhang,Xiaohong Zhang,Jim Leebens-Mack,Hong Ma,Naomi Altman,Claude W. dePamphilis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj051
IF: 10.7
2006-01-01
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Abstract:Gene duplication plays an important role in the evolution of diversity and novel function and is, especially prevalent in the nuclear genomes of flowering plants. Duplicate genes may be maintained through subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization at the level of expression or coding sequence. In order to test the hypothesis that duplicated regulatory genes will be differentially expressed in it specific manner indicative Of regulatory subfunctionalization and/or neofunctionalization, we examined expression pattern shifts in duplicated regulatory genes in Arabidopsis. A two-way analysis of variance was performed on expression data for 280 phylogenetically identified paralogous pairs. Expression data were extracted from global expression profiles for wild-type root, stern, leaf, developing inflorescence, nearly Mature flower buds, and seedpod. Gene, organ, and gene by organ interaction (G X O) effects were examined. Results indicate that 85% of the paralogous pairs exhibited it significant G X O effect indicative of regulatory subfunctionalization and/or neofunctionalization. A significant G X O effect was associated with complementary expression patterns in 45% of pairwise comparisons. No association was detected between it G X O effect and it relaxed evolutionary constraint its detected by the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions. Ancestral gene expression patterns inferred across it Type II MADS-box gene phylogeny Suggest several cases of regulatory neofunctionalization and organ-specific nonfunctionalization. Complete linkage clustering of gene expression levels across organs Suggests that regulatory modules for each organ are independent or ancestral genes had limited expression. We propose it new classification, regulatory hypofunctionalization, for an overall decrease in expression level in one member of a paralogous pair while still having a significant G X O effect. We conclude that expression divergence specifically indicative of subfunctionalization and/or neofunctionalization contributes to the maintenance of most if not all duplicated regulatory genes in Arabidopsis and hypothesize that this results in increasing expression diversity or specificity of regulatory genes after each round of duplication.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?