Abstract:To the Editor: In recent years, adult stem cells have attracted much attention over their potential applications in regenerative medicine.1,2 This encompasses all stem cells derived from the postnatal state, not the adult body only, and hence would also include umbilical cord blood–derived stem cells.3 Compared with embryonic and fetal stem cells, the application of adult stem cells in clinical therapy is much less ethically contentious.4 Moreover, adult stem cells from an autologous source would also circumvent the immunological barrier in clinical transplantation and negate the need for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching,5 as in the case of embryonic and fetal stem cells, which are invariably derived from an allogenic source. Of the diverse array of adult stem cells that have so far been identified, those derived from the bone marrow and umbilical cord blood appear particularly attractive for a number of reasons. Compared with other adult stem cell subpopulations that are relatively scarce and difficult to extract from the human body, these are relatively abundant and easy to isolate.6,7 Moreover, previous studies have also demonstrated that adult stem cells derived from the bone marrow and umbilical cord blood have relatively high proliferative capacity and regenerative potential as well as a more extensive multi-lineage differentiation potential compared with other adult stem cell types.1,6,7 Both these subpopulations of adult stem cells have their inherent advantages and limitations in clinical therapy. For example, several studies have demonstrated an age-related decline in the proliferative capacity and regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) extracted from bone marrow, which could limit their therapeutic usefulness in older patients.8,9 Presumably, no such limitation exists for stem cells derived from the umbilical cord blood because these are putatively in the neonatal state. Moreover, millions of new births every day produce an excess of discarded human umbilical cord,10 thus making stem cells extracted from these much more abundant and readily available compared with bone marrow–derived MSC. Nevertheless, it must be noted that umbilical cord blood–derived stem cells must be from an allogenic source, unless these were deliberately cryopreserved and stored for a particular newborn individual. Hence, there is ultimately the prospect of immunological rejection on transplantation or transfusion, unlike the case of autologous MSC derived from the bone marrow. Additionally, MSC have also been demonstrated to have immunoprivileged status and immunomodulatory properties11,12 absent in other adult stem cell subpopulations, thus making them ideally suited for transplantation therapy. A novel strategy may therefore be to combine and synergize the complementary therapeutic advantages of umbilical cord blood and bone marrow–derived stem cells in regenerative medicine. This may be achieved either through co-transplantation of both cell types locally at the same site or by simultaneous localized transplantation with transfusion into the peripheral circulation.13 Already, a number of studies have reported that co-transplantation of bone marrow–derived MSC enhanced the engraftment of umbilical cord blood–derived hematopoietic stem cells.14–16 However, all these studies were performed on immunologically deficient NOD/SCID mice,14–16 and it remains unclear whether co-transplantation could yield such a beneficial effect in the presence of an active immune system. The most obvious advantage of co-transplanting bone marrow derived–MSC with umbilical cord blood stem cells is that this could somehow make up for the shortfall in the total numbers of viable MSC that can be extracted from older patients because a certain threshold number of transplanted cells are probably required to achieve optimal efficacy of tissue/organ regeneration. Moreover, the putative neonatal state of umbilical cord blood–derived stem cells can also compensate for the age-related decline in the proliferative capacity and regenerative potential of MSC derived from older patients.8,9 Nevertheless, the major challenge would be to overcome immunological rejection against allogenic umbilical cord blood–derived stem cells. Even with extensive banking of umbilical cord blood–derived stem cells, it is virtually impossible to achieve a perfect HLA match,17 unless that particular individual’s umbilical cord blood cells had been cryopreserved and stored since birth. In this respect, bone marrow–derived MSC could prove particularly useful because these have been demonstrated to possess immunosuppressive properties.11,12 Hence, it is possible that transplanted autologous MSC may mitigate immunological rejection against co-transplanted umbilical cord blood–derived stem cells at the transplantation site. Once adequate tissue/organ regeneration has been achieved and the immunosuppressive effects of the co-transplanted MSC have worn off (i.e., through differentiation), then the engrafted allogenic umbilical cord blood stem cells may gradually be killed off by the recipient’s immune system while being replaced by proliferating autologous cells (i.e., co-transplanted MSC). Another possibility is that differentiated lineages may still retain the immuno-modulatory properties of their MSC precursors, as demonstrated by a recent study from our research group.18 Hence, there may be long-term tolerance induction of the allogenic umbilical cord blood cells through the immunomodulatory action of the co-transplanted autologous MSC. Certainly, it can be argued that immunosuppressive drugs can be used instead of co-transplanted MSC. Nevertheless, it must be remembered that the administration of such drugs often have various adverse side effects on patients.19 Moreover, the concentrated localized immunomodulatory effect of co-transplanted MSC at one particular site is preferable to the holistic effect of immunosuppressive drug administration. It may also be worthwhile to look at the possibility of co-transplanting differentiated progenies of allogenic umbilical cord blood stem cells with autologous MSC. The rationale is that paracrine signaling and cellular contacts provided by such differentiated progenies may result in a more conducive environment for directing co-transplanted autologous MSC into a required lineage at the transplantation site, since the natural milieu may already be compromised by the pathological state of the diseased/damaged tissue or organ requiring transplantation therapy. It must be noted that because umbilical cord blood stem cells are from a donated allogenic source, an extended period of time is available to differentiate them into a particular lineage before transplantation. By contrast, such an option is rarely available in the case of autologous MSC because of the urgency of life-saving treatment for the patient. Hence, in this manner, differentiated progenies of umbilical cord blood stem cells can possibly be used as “cellular catalysts” to promote the appropriate differentiation of co-transplanted autologous MSC in situ, which could in turn enhance their subsequent engraftment and integration within recipient tissues/organs. Nevertheless, as highlighted in our previous article,20 there are various challenges faced with transplanting differentiated cells, such as their lower proliferative capacity, higher antigenicity, and more complex nutritional requirement, which in turn could compromise their survival within the adverse pathological environment of the transplantation site. Hence, it is imperative to find a subtle balance somewhere between the undifferentiated and fully differentiated state20 of umbilical cord blood–derived stem cells that would be optimal for co-transplantation with MSC. Besides co-transplantation, an alternative strategy may be to carry out simultaneous transplantation and transfusion of both stem cell types.13 In this case, hematopoietic stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood could be more suited for transfusion, whereas bone marrow–derived MSC could be more suited for transplantation in situ at the site of tissue/organ damage. Perhaps it may be worthwhile for both stem cell types to be committed to different lineages. For example, the repair of a myocardially infarcted heart would require both the regeneration of damaged cardiac muscles as well as neovascularization.21 Hence, it could be advantageous to transplant cardiomyocyte precursors derived from bone marrow MSC22 directly in situ within the damaged myocardium, while at the same time transfusing endothelial progenitors23 derived from umbilical cord blood into the peripheral circulation. In this case, the use of recombinant DNA transfection24 or other newly developed technology for gene modulation such as protein transduction domains fusion transcription factors25,26 may obviate the need for extended durations of ex vivo culture to achieve lineage commitment. The recent identification and characterization of various chemokines and cytokines involved in stem cell migration and homing open up an exciting possibility for their application in transplantation/transfusion therapy.27,28 For example, the transplanted MSC may be delivered on tissue-engineered scaffolds that are designed for the controlled release of specific homing factors such as SDF-1.29 Another alternative may be to stimulate or genetically modulate the transplanted MSC to copiously secrete homing factors such as SDF-129 to encourage the migration and homing of transfused umbilical cord blood stem cells within the peripheral circulation. At the same time, it may also be advantageous to prestimulate the transfused umbilical cord blood stem cells to strongly express surface receptors specific to homing factors such as SDF-1. Of particular interest would be CXCR-4. In the seminal study of Peled et al.,30 it was demonstrated that pretreatment with stem cell factor and interleukin-6 upregulated CXCR-4 expression on CD34+ cells, which in turn potentiated SDF-1–induced migration and engraftment in primary and secondary transplanted mice. Hence, there are indeed many exciting possibilities in combining and synergizing the therapeutic advantages of allogenic umbilical cord blood–derived stem cells and autologous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells. This would certainly warrant further investigation.

Abstract:Every century is characterized by scientific achievements that become its historical landmarks and symbols. The previous century will be remembered for its significant discoveries relating to theoretical physics, chemistry, and biology, including stem cells. This latter discovery will be especially memorable for having opened the door to the development of regenerative medicine. There is no doubt that stem cell-based therapies will be regarded by future generations as a landmark achievement of the twenty-first century. While this is a huge challenge for medical science, there is hope that new therapies will be developed that enable several so-far-incurable diseases to be cured, prolonging life span and improving the quality of life. Clinical and Translational Medicine will keep pace with these new challenges by opening a new section dedicated to stem cell therapies, which will offer original peer-reviewed articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and perspectives. We will also welcome papers focused on bioethics, clinical regulations, clinical guidelines, and methodologies, and brief reports on experimental and clinical applications of stem cells. We were very lucky to recruit outstanding editorial board members for this section. There are many journals dedicated to regenerative medicine. Nevertheless, we would like to be unique in this field in some way. Since the paradigms of science shift, and, as Albert Einstein once stated, “blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth”, we would like to launch a new section that will provide a forum for new and challenging ideas and report progress in regenerative medicine. There are still many questions that need to be answered with hypothesis testing by independent groups. We are aware that our current work will require new generations of scientists not only to verify many of the current paradigms but also to carry forward progress in regenerative medicine in the coming decades. Regenerative medicine has two main goals. The first is to employ stem cells efficiently and safely in therapies for injured organs and tissues. It is believed that, in the future, the transplantation of entire organs will be largely replaced by the transplantation of a suspension of stem cells directed to the given organ, alone or in combination with organic or synthetic scaffolds, which will perform the task of rebuilding the injured tissues. The second important and parallel goal of regenerative medicine is to develop strategies that will improve quality of life and longevity by improving the regenerative potential and proper functioning of adult stem cells residing in various organs. Some of the most important challenges and topics that will be covered by this new section of Clinical and Translational Medicine are listed below. Search for the most efficient stem cell for clinical application The search for stem cells that can be safely and efficiently employed for regeneration of damaged solid organs continues. Ideal for this purpose would be pluripotent stem cells, which, according to their definition, have broad potential to differentiate into cells belonging to the three germ layers [1]. For almost 20 years, there have been unsuccessful attempts to harness embryonic stem cells isolated from embryos, which has been controversial from an ethical point of view. A more promising source is induced pluripotent stem cells, which are generated by genetic modification of adult somatic cells. Unfortunately, both embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells bear a similar risk of tumor formation after injection into the host [1, 2]. On the other hand, stem cells isolated from postnatal tissues, such as bone marrow, mobilized peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood, umbilical cord, placenta, fat, or epidermis, are the only stem cells that have been employed safely in the clinic so far. Since these are already committed to certain lineages, the question remains whether adult tissues also harbor other stem cells with much broader differentiation potential across germ layers that are multi- or pluripotent. These investigations and the search for such cells have prompted to challenge the accepted hierarchy of the stem cell compartment in adult tissues [1, 2]. Paracrine- and extracellular microvesicle-mediated effects of stem cell therapies While mesenchymal stem cells, cardiac stem cells, and hematopoietic stem cells are employed in the clinic, there has been a lack of convincing documentation for donor–recipient chimerism in the solid organs treated, and most studies indicate that a mechanism other than transdifferentiation of cells plays a role, most likely involving the paracrine effects of growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, bioactive lipids, and extracellular microvesicles released from cells employed as cellular therapeutics [3, 4]. These beneficial paracrine mechanisms could be harnessed more efficiently to regenerate damaged organs. Stem cells could be modified to secrete more of the paracrine factors that inhibit apoptosis in damaged tissues and enhance vascularization. One of the immediate and safe applications for induced pluripotent stem cells would be their application as cell lines for producing therapeutic extracellular microvesicles [3, 4]. Molecular mechanisms involved in stem cell pluripotency, quiescence, proliferation, and differentiation The number of stem cells isolated from adult tissues is usually very limited. In particular, the most primitive stem cells (from a developmental point of view) are present at very low frequencies in adult tissues. To overcome this problem, different ex vivo expansion strategies have been proposed to amplify the numbers of these cells so that they can be employed more efficiently in the clinic. Unfortunately, optimized expansion protocols for the most primitive stem cells have not been described so far, and during expansion these most primitive cells decrease in number due to their differentiation into more mature progenitors [5]. An efficient expansion strategy requires identification of the set of genes that balances pluripotency, multipotency, and stem cell self-renewal with differentiation. Unravelling the mechanisms that govern the quiescence of the most primitive stem cells in adult tissues is of primary importance in developing expansion strategies for these rare cells that will allow their application in the clinic [6]. An important additional goal of regenerative medicine is to develop strategies that enhance quality of life and longevity by improving the regenerative potential and proper functioning of adult stem cells residing in various organs. This could be achieved by application of anti-aging drugs, caloric restriction, or regular physical activity [7]. Thus, anti-aging strategies for stem cells will be one of the important topics of this new section. Mechanisms that govern stem cell trafficking, including mobilization and homing to damaged tissues It is known that stem cells are endowed with migratory potential and that they are released from their niches in a process known as mobilization. In the reverse process, stem cells settle into niches during so-called homing. Mechanisms that govern mobilization and homing have been best studied so far in hematopoietic stem cells [1, 8-10]. However, evidence has accumulated that other types of stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells, also undergo mobilization into peripheral blood. Therefore, in order to enrich peripheral blood in circulating stem cells, more efficient mobilization protocols have to be developed. On the other hand, we need to identify the mechanisms and all the regulatory factors (e.g., chemokines, growth factors, bioactive lipids, extracellular nucleotides) that govern trafficking of stem cells in the body. It is also crucial to develop optimal strategies for harvesting stem cells and to establish protocols for their delivery to damaged tissues. Another important issue is delivery of stem cells using special scaffolds that accelerate organ regeneration. Clinical ethics, regulations, trials, protocols, and practices for stem cell therapies All new experimental treatment strategies in regenerative medicine must ultimately be tested in the clinic. This approach requires dealing with ethical and regulatory issues and has to be based on solid clinical development and approval by appropriate board protocols. It is obvious that clinical application of stem cells that follows good medical practice guidelines will require unified procedures and protocols so that trials can be compared between different centers [5, 11, 12]. This will require communication and cooperation between investigators around the globe. Our section will provide such a forum for the exchange of ideas and unification of procedures. Clinical and Translational Medicine is launching a new section on stem cell therapies that will concentrate on experimental and clinical results for stem cell applications in regenerative medicine, stem cell isolation, and expansion, with a focus on stem cells isolated or derived from adult tissues, umbilical cord blood, umbilical cord, placenta, fat tissue, and myocardium. It will also deal with molecular mechanisms involved in stem cell pluripotency, quiescence, proliferation, and differentiation and will cover mechanisms that regulate stem cell trafficking, including their mobilization into peripheral blood and homing to damaged tissues. Moreover, it will cover paracrine- and extracellular microvesicle-mediated effects of stem cell therapies, clinical ethics, regulations, trials, protocols, and practices of stem cell therapies in regenerative medicine. We encourage investigators to submit their best work so that, if accepted, it will be immediately spread throughout the scientific community through the open access format of our journal. Our section will be wide open to new discoveries and challenging ideas and we would like to welcome and publish your best research.

Possible Advantages of Stem Cell Transfusion into the Peripheral Circulation, As Opposed to Localized Transplantation in Situ.

Combining Transfusion of Stem/progenitor Cells into the Peripheral Circulation with Localized Transplantation in Situ at the Site of Tissue/organ Damage: A Possible Strategy to Optimize the Efficacy of Stem Cell Transplantation Therapy

Reply to Letter from Drs. Haider and Ashraf

Comments about Possible Use of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes to Direct Autologous Adult Stem Cells into the Cardiomyogenic Lineage

Transplanted stem cell-secreted VEGF effects post-stroke recovery , inflammation , and vascular repair

Utilizing Stem Cells for Myocardial Repair – to Differentiate or Not to Differentiate Prior to Transplantation?

Incorporating protein transduction domains (PTD) within intracellular proteins associated with the ‘stemness’ phenotype. Novel use of such recombinant ‘fusion’ proteins to overcome current limitations of applying autologous adult stem cells in regenerative medicine?

The Differentiation Status of Stem Cells and Their Derivatives: A Key Consideration in Transplantation Medicine

Autologous Transplantation of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell in Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia

MILIEU-BASED VERSUS GENE-MODULATORY STRATEGIES FOR DIRECTING STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION—A MAJOR ISSUE OF CONTENTION IN TRANSPLANTATION MEDICINE

Homing of intravenously infused embryonic stem cell- derived cells to injured hearts after myocardial infarction

Role of Stem Cell Homing in Myocardial Regeneration

Potential Benefits of Co-Transplanting Autologous Adult Stem Cells Together with Human Embryonic Stem Cells or Their Differentiated Derivatives.

Concise Review: Optimized Strategies for Stem Cell-based Therapy in Myocardial Repair: Clinical Translatability and Potential Limitation.

Can the Therapeutic Advantages of Allogenic Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Stem Cells and Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Be Combined and Synergized?

Transplanted Human Embryonic Stem Cells As Biological ‘catalysts’ for Tissue Repair and Regeneration

Challenges, Progress, and New Directions in Stem Cell Therapies: a New Section Launched in Clinical and Translational Medicine

Utilising Human Embryonic Stem Cells As ‘catalysts’ for Biological Repair and Regeneration. Challenges and Some Possible Strategies

Cell survival and redistribution after transplantation into damaged myocardium.

Optimizing Blood Stem Cell Transplants Through Cellular Engineering

Synergistic actions of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in vascularizing bioengineered tissues.