Sorcin and Ryanodine Receptors in Heart Failure.

HH Valdivia,EF Farrell,A Antaramian,N Benkusky,XS Zhu,A Rueda,AM Gomez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.112.270876

2004-01-01

Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility

Abstract:HomeCirculation ResearchVol. 110, No. 11Ryanodine Receptor Phosphorylation and Heart Failure Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBRyanodine Receptor Phosphorylation and Heart FailurePhasing Out S2808 and “Criminalizing” S2814 Héctor H. Valdivia Héctor H. ValdiviaHéctor H. Valdivia From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Search for more papers by this author Originally published25 May 2012https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.270876Circulation Research. 2012;110:1398–1402By the time the heart reaches the pathological state clinically recognized as heart failure (HF), it has undergone profound and often irreversible alterations in structure and function at the molecular, cellular, and organ level. Although the etiologies of HF are diverse (hypertension, myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis, valvular insufficiency, mutations in genes encoding sarcomeric proteins, etc), some alterations are commonly found in most forms of HF, and they may account for the maladaptive structural remodeling and systolic dysfunction that characterize this syndrome. At the cellular level, there are well-documented changes in ionic channel density and function (electric remodeling), increased ROS production, mitochondrial dysfunction, imbalanced energy intake and consumption, genetic reprogramming, altered excitation-contraction coupling, and, in general, dysregulation of a multitude of other processes and pathways that are essential for proper cardiac function.1 Combined, this myriad of alterations leads to loss in contractility and ejection fraction, ventricular wall remodeling, increased vascular resistance, and dysregulated fluid homeostasis. In this issue of Circulation Research, Respress et al2 report that preventing phosphorylation of cardiac ryanodine receptors (RyR2) at a single residue, S2814, is sufficient to avert many of these alterations and improve cardiac function in HF. The results presented follow a string of papers that touch on the delicate and controversial subject of ryanodine receptor phosphorylation and HF. They offer a new twist to a contentious story and attempt to reconcile many apparently contradicting results, but key issues remain.Article, see p 1474Calcium Leak in HFAlthough, as mentioned above, the etiologies of HF are diverse, it appears that suppressing the dysfunction of a select group of biological and molecular signaling pathways may substantially improve or even reverse the cardiac deterioration observed in HF. For example, correcting the characteristically depressed sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium content of failing cardiomyocytes is a target of HF gene therapy.3 SR calcium leak, an operational term that indicates increased and untimely calcium release by RyR2s, also appears common to several models of HF,4,5 and it is reasonable to postulate that stemming off calcium leak may prevent the progression of cardiac malfunction in HF patients. However, a rationalized therapy toward this aim must be founded on the precise knowledge of the mechanisms leading to calcium leak, and work toward this knowledge has accelerated in recent years. The Marks group, 6 in a landmark publication in 2000 and later in multiple other high-impact factor papers (many of them coauthored by Wehrens7–10), postulated that RyR2 hyperphosphorylation at S2808 by protein kinase (PK)A was the primary mechanism leading to increased calcium leak in HF. This idea was initially appealing and fueled intensive research in the subject, but many groups failed to reproduce central tenets of this hypothesis.11,12 The controversies surrounding the Marks-Wehrens hypothesis of increased calcium leak by hyperphosphorylation of RyR2-S2808 have been recently and comprehensibly reviewed by Bers.13 I will focus on the modifications to this hypothesis as derived from the new findings of Respress et al.2 Emerging points from these new findings will be the demotion of S2808, to intervene not as universal player in HF but only in selective forms of this syndrome, and the role of S2814 as preeminent generator of calcium leak that leads to arrhythmias and exacerbates other forms of HF. The “criminalization” of S2814 has begun in earnest.CaMKII Effect on Calcium Leak and the Role of S2808 and S2814Many studies have provided evidence that persistent Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) activity can lead to cardiac arrhythmias and promote HF.14–16 Animals and patients with congestive HF display increased levels of CaMKII,17,18 and overexpression of AC3-I, a peptide inhibitor of CaMKII, delays the onset of HF in mice.19 There is also good agreement4,20 (although not universal21) that CaMKII, and not PKA, increases calcium leak, and therefore it is likely that the arrhythmogenic and deleterious activity of CaMKII in HF may be associated with this effect. Obviously, if PKA does not cause calcium leak directly, this by itself imposes insurmountable constraints on the Marks-Wehrens hypothesis that posits that PKA phosphorylation of RyR2-S2808 is responsible for the high calcium leak of HF. With the focus now on CaMKII, the obligated question is then, by what mechanisms CaMKII increases calcium leak from the SR? To increase calcium leak, the cell must either increase SR calcium content, and/or increase the activity of the RyR2 (albeit the latter alone would have only transient effects due to autoregulatory mechanisms22). Since both PKA and CaMKII increase SR calcium load by phosphorylating phospholamban (but at different residues) and relieving the inhibition it exerts on SERCA2a, the differential effect of these kinases must result from the regulation they exert on RyR2s. The Wehrens group offers2 at least a partial explanation of this complex mechanism, and, along with previous papers coauthored with Marks, these groups set specific roles for S2808 and S2814 on regulation of RyR2 activity and their protective effect (or lack thereof) in HF. In their view, PKA exclusively phosphorylates S2808 and dissociates FKBP12.6, which destabilizes the closed state of the channel and increases RyR2 activity, whereas CaMKII (almost) exclusively phosphorylates S2814, has no effect on FKBP12.6 binding, and equally activates RyR2s. In this issue of the Journal, Respress et al2 report that preventing phosphorylation of S2814 (by genetic substitution of Ser by Ala, S2814A) protects against nonischemic (pressure overload) HF but has no effect on ischemic HF; conversely, and against other data by the same groups, S2808 phosphorylation was not significantly different in nonischemic HF, implying that it is relevant only in ischemic HF. This clean targeting of RyR2 phospho-epitopes by PKA and CaMKII and their nice division of labor for pathogenicity in distinct forms of HF would really simplify phosphorylation schemes and reconcile apparent contradictions. However, as is generally the case, the proposal appears oversimplified and almost too good to be true. Let's discuss each of the premises on which the Respress et al2 results have been interpreted and the problems associated with these premises.One Kinase Equals One Site Equals One Effect: Is It Really That Simple?The RyR2 is a huge protein. It is assembled as a tetrameric complex of ≈2 million Da, with each subunit composed of ≈5000 amino acids. Using canonical phosphorylation consensus and high confidence values, the RyR2 may be phosphorylated in silico at more than 100 sites by the combined action of PKA, CaMKII, PKG, and PKC, to name a few.11 Granted, a potential phosphorylation site is very different than a demonstrated, physiologically relevant phosphorylation site, and it is possible that many of the predicted residues are not phosphorylated in vivo. Even then, several groups have demonstrated that CaMKII phosphorylates RyR2 with stoichiometry of at least 3 or 4 to 1 with respect to PKA.23–26 This fact is by itself compelling evidence that there are multiple phosphorylation sites in RyR2. Now, let's make the optimistic assumption that all the PKA sites have already been mapped and that S2808 and S2030 are the only PKA sites.27 Taking into account the CaMKII:PKA phosphorylation ratio (3:1 or 4:1), this would then yield a minimum of ≈6 to 8 CaMKII phosphorylation sites (per channel subunit!). In this perspective, it is almost disingenuous to label S2808 as the PKA site, and we may purposely deceive ourselves when we label S2814 the CaMKII site. Against this sense of pessimism and intractability, let's not forget that S2808 was actually discovered as a CaMKII site.24 It is possible then that the number of CaMKII sites is smaller if only S2030 remains as a bona fide PKA site. Still, neither scheme supports one CaMKII site per channel subunit.But let's go along for a moment with the possibility, however unlikely, that PKA phosphorylates S2808 only, and CaMKII phosphorylates S2814 only. When calling these sites by their distinctive numbers, it is easy to forget that these phospho-sites are only 6 residues apart, that is, a minuscule proportion (≈0.000003%) in the context of the whole channel protein. How can the same reaction (phosphorylation) that occurs at sites so close to one another be differentially transmitted to the very distant gating domains of the channel? If these residues were lining the pore of the channel, where critical differences emerge by substituting one residue but not the neighboring one, then it would be easier to understand how S2808 and S2814 could transmit distinct signals. But both are part of a “phosphorylation hot spot,” a cytoplasmic loop that contains additional potential phospho-sites11 and that has been mapped to the external surface of the channel.28 The Marks and Wehrens groups have shown that phosphorylation of S2808A by CaMKII or of S2814A by PKA fully activate the channel.7,9 At face value, this means that knocking out one phospho-residue does not cripple this “hot spot” and that phosphorylation of at least one residue in this external loop enables it to transmit conformational changes to the gating domains of the channel. Seen in this structural context in which the “hot spot” works in unison on phosphorylation of at least one residue, it is very difficult (but not impossible) to accommodate the notion that phosphorylation of S2808 or S2814 alone dictates the differential response of the RyR2 to PKA and CaMKII.An Alternative Model to Explain Differential PKA and CaMKII EffectsAn alternative model to explain the differential effect of PKA and CaMKII to elicit calcium leak from RyR2 that takes into account other phospho-sites is needed. Before formulating it, let's consider some important points. First, it is not difficult to assume that the role of the “phosphorylation hot spot” is to readily pick up signals from different kinases. The multivalence of this “hot spot” is demonstrated so far by the fact that S2808 may be phosphorylated by CaMKII24–26 and by PKA,6,25,26 and its eagerness to undergo phosphorylation by the fact that S2808 is at least ≈50% phosphorylated even at basal state25–27,29,30 and phospho-signals from these sites may be readily detected on β-adrenergic stimulation of the heart.30,31 Second, if we accept the Shannon and Bers results that CaMKII and not PKA elicits calcium leak from the SR,4,20 this obligatorily means that PKA phosphorylation of S2808 is not responsible for eliciting calcium leak (in direct conflict with the Marks-Wehrens hypothesis). In support of this notion, studies by the Houser and Valdivia groups have provided evidence that preventing S2808 phosphorylation has negligible impact on the β-adrenergic response of the heart and on the progression of nonischemic and ischemic HF.30–32 Third, another PKA site, S2030, largely ignored in the Marks-Wehrens scheme, has been mapped and shown to activate channel openings,27 and, although its place in the larger context of RyR2 phosphorylation has not been determined yet, I think it is illogical to assume that its existence is futile and that it contributes nothing to regulation of the channel. Thus, according to the preceding discussion, it is almost unsustainable to postulate that the differential effects of CaMKII and PKA to elicit calcium leak stems from their effects on the RyR2 “phosphorylation hot spot” alone. Instead, I would like to posit an alternative model that integrates findings by many of the above-referenced groups (Figure). In this model, the surface domain of the RyR2 comprising residues 2804 to 2814 (mouse nomenclature) is an eager target for phosphorylation by PKA, CaMKII and probably other kinases (4 Ser/Thr).11,24–26,29 Phosphorylation of this “hot spot” by either PKA or CaMKII (or both) primes the RyR2 for subsequent signals and is probably responsible for the coordinated openings in response to fast calcium stimuli detected in single channel recordings33 and in cellular settings34 (but this has yet to be demonstrated). The differential effect of PKA and CaMKII on RyR2 activity would then depend on the integrated response of the phosphorylated “hot spot” and of additional phosphorylation sites. For example, phosphorylation of S2808 and S2030 by PKA could coordinate channel openings in response to fast calcium stimuli, and phosphorylation of S2814 and other CaMKII site(s) could open RyR2s at diastolic [Ca2+], which would translate in calcium leak. Examples of proteins acting as molecular switchboards in response to various degrees of phosphorylation are not unprecedented.35 In fact, RyR2s are activated by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation as well,36,37 and their relative degree of phosphorylation determines a final functional output.38 It is therefore conceivable that the complex response of RyR2s to any type of phosphorylation and the variable results obtained by investigators apparently using the same experimental conditions may be due to the variable degree of phosphorylation in which the RyR2s were found. Of course, until the 3D structure of the RyR2 is solved and we understand the mechanism by which the “phosphorylation hot spot” and other phospho-sites talk to the channel's gating domains this structurally based model will remain speculative, but it at least takes into consideration compelling evidence on the existence of various phosphorylation sites and departs substantially from the simplified notion of one kinase equals one site equals one effect.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Models of RyR2 modulation by phosphorylation. In the Marks-Wehrens model (A), S2808 is the only site phosphorylated by PKA, and S2814 by CaMKII. PKA phosphorylation of S2808 dissociates FKBP12.6, which destabilizes the closed state of the channel and induces subconductance states, eliciting calcium leak. Calcium leak from the SR then causes deleterious effects such as arrhythmias and worsening of (ischemic) HF. CaMKII phosphorylation of S2814 does not dissociate FKBP12.6 but also causes calcium leak. This leak is also arrhythmogenic but is not relevant in ischemic HF, only in nonischemic HF. In the multiphosphorylation site model (B), S2808 and S2814 are part of a “phosphorylation hot spot” that is located in a protruding part of the channel, is targeted by several kinases, and may contain other phospho-epitopes not yet characterized. Phosphorylation of individual residues within this “hot spot” may be undistinguishable by the channel's gating domains; instead, the differential regulation of PKA and CaMKII on channel gating may come about by the combined effect of each kinase on phospho-residues of the “hot spot” and other phosphorylation sites.Now, let's go back to the results of Respress et al2 and consider them in this light. They found that preventing phosphorylation of S2814 alone mitigates nonischemic HF induced by transverse aortic constriction in mice. This implies that other CaMKII sites are not necessary to mitigate the CaMKII-induced calcium leak that they propose is responsible for the deleterious effect in WT mice subjected to transverse aortic constriction. If phosphorylation of the “hot spot” is compulsory to prime the RyR2 to process and discriminate other phosphorylation signals, then other residues in that “hot spot” must have been phosphorylated to fulfill this need. Surprisingly, S2808 was not significantly phosphorylated in this setting. This leaves a very difficult conundrum: if S2808 was not phosphorylated significantly and the other CaMKII sites are not necessary to stop calcium leak, how then can we explain the results of Respress et al?2 Of course there are always alternatives, and we would be inconsistent if we rigidly adhere to one model and fell into the dogmatism we are criticizing. The conclusions of Respress et al2 are in line with their findings, but at this point the numbers do not add up and it's obvious that the great complexity of this process (RyR2 phosphorylation) precludes simplified and neatly organized schemes. As a clear example of this, in the landmark paper by the Marks group,6 S2808 was found substantially hyperphosphorylated in tachypacing-induced failing dogs, also a nonischemic model of HF. This does not fit well in the current scheme of Wehrens, in which S2808A protects against ischemic HF but has no prominent role in nonischemic HF.In summary, CaMKII and PKA may have specific roles in calcium leak and, since they both increase SR calcium load, their differential effect probably resides on their effect on RyR2s. However, the effect of PKA- or CaMKII-phosphorylation of RyR2s does not appear solved yet. Starting in 2000 and up to the present day, Marks and Wehrens have provided high-quality data in prominent journals aggressively pursuing the notion that PKA phosphorylates S2808 only, that CaMKII phosphorylates S2814 only, and that these sites alone integrate multiple signals to open RyR2s. Many key aspects of their general hypothesis including dissociation of FKBP12.6 by PKA phosphorylation of S2808, subconductance states as hallmarks of phosphorylation, and the prominent role of S2808 as promoter of arrhythmias and HF have not been confirmed by several groups. The present report by the Wehrens group modifies slightly the original claim that S2808 was involved in ischemic and nonischemic forms of HF and continues to shift the lion's share of pathogenicity to S2814. However, as discussed above, the Marks-Wehrens model largely ignores compelling data on the presence of multiple phosphorylation sites and the complexity they add to the finely graded response of RyR2s to phosphorylation.Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms CaMKIICa2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIHFheart failurePKprotein kinaseRyR2ryanodine receptorsSRsarcoplasmic reticulumSources of FundingThis work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health (PO1-HL094291, RO1-HL055438, and RO1-HL108175).DisclosuresNone.FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to Héctor H. Valdivia, MD, PhD, Center for Arrhythmia Research, North Campus Research Complex, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Ave, 26–235N, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail [email protected]eduReferences1. Margulies KB, Houser SR. Myocyte abnormalities in human heart failure. In: Mann DL, editor. Heart Failure: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Inc; 2004.Google Scholar2. Respress JL, van Oort RJ, Li N, et al. Role of RyR2 Phosphorylation at S2814 during heart failure progression. Circ Res. 2012; 110:1474–1483.LinkGoogle Scholar3. Tilemann L, Ishikawa K, Weber T, Hajjar RJ. Gene therapy for heart failure. Circ Res. 2012; 110:777–793.LinkGoogle Scholar4. Ai X, Curran JW, Shannon TR, Bers DM, Pogwizd SM. Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase modulates RyR2 phosphorylation and SR Ca2+ leak in a rabbit heart failure. Circ Res. 2005; 97:1314–1322.LinkGoogle Scholar5. Shannon TR, Pogwizd SM, Bers DM. Elevated sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ leak in intact ventricular myocytes from rabbits in heart failure. Circ Res. 2003; 93:592–594.LinkGoogle Scholar6. Marx SO, Reiken S, Hisamatsu Y, Jayaraman T, Burkhoff D, Rosemblit N, Marks AR. PKA phosphorylation dissociates FKBP12.6 from the calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor): defective regulation in failing hearts. Cell. 2000; 101:365–376.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Wehrens XH, Lehnart SE, Reiken S, Vest JA, Wronska A, Marks AR. Ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel PKA phosphorylation: a critical mediator of heart failure progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103:511–518.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Wehrens XH, Lehnart SE, Huang F, et al. FKBP12.6 deficiency and defective calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor) function linked to exercise-induced sudden cardiac death. Cell. 2003; 113:829–840.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Wehrens XHT, Lehnart SE, Reiken SR, Marks AR. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II phosphorylation regulates the cardiac ryanodine receptor. Circ Res. 2004; 94:e61–e70.LinkGoogle Scholar10. Wehrens XHT, Lehnart SE, Reiken SR, Deng SX, Vest JA, Cervantes D, Coromilas J, Landry DW, Marks AR. Protection from cardiac arrhythmia through ryanodine receptor-stabilizing protein calstabin 2. Science. 2004; 304:292–296.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. George CH. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca leak in heart failure: mere observation or functional relevance?Cardiovasc Res. 2008; 77:302–314.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Eschenhagen T. Is ryanodine receptor phosphorylation key to the fight or flight response and heart failure?J Clin Invest. 2010; 120:4197–4203.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Bers DM. Ryanodine receptor S2808 phosphorylation in heart failure: smoking gun or red herring. Circ Res. 2012; 110:796–799.LinkGoogle Scholar14. Zhang T, Maier LS, Dalton ND, Miyamoto S, Ross J, Bers DM, Brown JH. The deltaC isoform of CaMKII is activated in cardiac hypertrophy and induces dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Circ Res. 2003; 92:912–919.LinkGoogle Scholar15. Anderson ME, Brown JH, Bers DM. CaMKII in myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011; 51:468–473.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Ling H, Zhang T, Pereira L, Means CK, Cheng H, Gu Y, Dalton ND, Peterson KL, Chen J, Bers DM, Heller Brown J. Requirement for Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II in the transition from pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy to heart failure in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009; 119:1230–1240.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Hoch B, Meyer R, Hetzer R, Krause EG, Karczewski P. Identification and expression of delta isoforms of the multifunctional Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in failing and nonfailing human myocardium. Circ Res. 1999; 84:713–721.LinkGoogle Scholar18. Hagemann D, Bohlender J, Hoch B, Krause EG, Karczewski P. Expression of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II delta-subunit isoforms in rats with hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001; 220:69–76.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19. Zhang R, Khoo MS, Wu Y, et al. Calmodulin kinase II inhibition protects against structural heart disease. Nat Med. 2005; 11:409–417.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. Curran J, Ríos E, Bers DM, Shannon TR. β-adrenergic enhancement of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca leak in cardiac myocytes is mediated by Ca-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. Circ Res. 2007; 100:391–398.LinkGoogle Scholar21. Yang D, Zhu WZ, Xiao B, Brochet DX, Chen SR, Lakatta EG, Xiao RP, Cheng H. Ca2+/calmodulin kinase II-dependent phosphorylation of ryanodine receptors suppresses Ca2+ sparks and Ca2+ waves in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 2007; 100:399–407.LinkGoogle Scholar22. Díaz ME, Graham HK, O'Neill SC, Trafford AW, Eisner DA. The control of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca content in cardiac muscle. Cell Calcium. 2005; 38:391–396.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23. Takasago T, Imagawa T, Furukawa K, Ogurusu T, Shigekawa M. Regulation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor by protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation. J Biochem. 1991; 109:163–170.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24. Witcher DR, Kovacs RJ, Schulman H, Cefali DC, Jones LR. Unique phosphorylation site on the cardiac ryanodine receptor regulates calcium channel activity. J Biol Chem. 1991; 266:11144–11152.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar25. Rodriguez P, Bhogal MS, Colyer J. Stoichiometric phosphorylation of cardiac ryanodine receptor on serine 2809 by calmodulin-dependent kinase II and protein kinase A. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278:38593–38600.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar26. Currie S, Loughrey CM, Craig MA, Smith GL. Calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase IIdelta associates with the ryanodine receptor complex and regulates channel function in rabbit heart. Biochem J. 2004; 377:357–366.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar27. Xiao B, Jiang MT, Zhao M, Yang D, Sutherland C, Lai FA, Walsh MP, Warltier DC, Cheng H, Chen SR. Characterization of a novel PKA phosphorylation site, serine-2030, reveals no PKA hyperphosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor in canine heart failure. Circ Res. 2005; 96:847–855.LinkGoogle Scholar28. Meng X, Xiao B, Cai S, Huang X, Li F, Bolstad J, Trujillo R, Airey J, Chen SR, Wagenknecht T, Liu Z. Three-dimensional localization of serine 2808, a phosphorylation site in cardiac ryanodine receptor. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282:25929–25939.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29. Huke S, Bers DM. Ryanodine receptor phosphorylation at serine 2030, 2808 and 2814 in rat cardiomyocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008; 376:80–85.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar30. Benkusky NA, Weber CS, Scherman JA, Farrell EF, Hacker TA, John MC, Powers PA, Valdivia HH. Intact beta-adrenergic response and unmodified progression toward heart failure in mice with genetic ablation of a major protein kinase a phosphorylation site in the cardiac ryanodine receptor. Circ Res. 2007; 101:819–829.LinkGoogle Scholar31. MacDonnell SM, Garcia-Rivas G, Scherman JA, Kubo H, Chen X, Valdivia H, Houser SR. Adrenergic regulation of cardiac contractility does not involve phosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor at serine 2808. Circ Res. 2008; 102:e65–e72.LinkGoogle Scholar32. Zhang H, Makarewich C, Kubo H, Wang W, Duran JM, Li Y, Berretta RM, Koch WJ, Chen X, Gao E, Valdivia HH, Houser SR. Hyperphosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor at serine 2808 is not involved in cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2012; 110:831–840.LinkGoogle Scholar33. Valdivia HH, Kaplan JH, Ellis-Davies GC, Lederer WJ. Rapid adaptation of cardiac ryanodine receptors: modulation by Mg2+ and phosphorylation. Science. 1995; 267:1997–2000.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar34. Ginsburg KS, Bers DM. Modulation of excitation-contraction coupling by isoproterenol in cardiomyocytes with controlled SR Ca load and iCa trigger. J Physiol. 2004; 556:463–480.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar35. Domingo-Sananes MR, Kapuy O, Hunt T, Novak B. Switches and latches: a biochemical tug-of-war between the kinases and phosphatases that control mitosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366:3584–3594.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar36. Lokuta AJ, Rogers TB, Lederer WJ, Valdivia HH. Modulation of cardiac ryanodine receptors of swine and rabbit by a phosphorylation-dephosphorylation mechanism. J Physiol. 1995; 487:609–622.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37. Terentyev D, Viatchenko-Karpinski S, Gyorke I, Terentyeva R, Gyorke S. Protein phosphatases decrease sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium content by stimulating calcium release in cardiac myocytes. J Physiol. 2003; 552:109–118.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar38. Carter S, Colyer J, Sitsapesan R. Maximum phosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor at Ser-2809 by protein kinase A produces unique modifications to channel gating and conductance not observed at lower levels of phosphorylation. Circ Res. 2006; 98:1506–1513.LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Dixon R (2022) Nanoscale Organization, Regulation, and Dynamic Reorganization of Cardiac Calcium Channels, Frontiers in Physiology, 10.3389/fphys.2021.810408, 12 Lahiri S, Aguilar-Sanchez Y and Wehrens X (2021) Mechanisms underlying pathological Ca2+ handling in diseases of the heart, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 10.1007/s00424-020-02504-z, 473:3, (331-347), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021. Gaburjakova J, Krejciova E and Gaburjakova M (2020) Multisite phosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor: a random or coordinated event?, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 10.1007/s00424-020-02473-3, 472:12, (1793-1807), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020. Fernández-Miranda G, Romero-Garcia T, Barrera-Lechuga T, Mercado-Morales M and Rueda A (2019) Impaired Activity of Ryanodine Receptors Contributes to Calcium Mishandling in Cardiomyocytes of Metabolic Syndrome Rats, Frontiers in Physiology, 10.3389/fphys.2019.00520, 10 Potenza D, Janicek R, Fernandez-Tenorio M, Camors E, Ramos-Mondragón R, Valdivia H and Niggli E (2018) Phosphorylation of the ryanodine receptor 2 at serine 2030 is required for a complete β-adrenergic response, Journal of General Physiology, 10.1085/jgp.201812155, 151:2, (131-145), Online publication date: 4-Feb-2019. Høydal M, Kirkeby-Garstad I, Karevold A, Wiseth R, Haaverstad R, Wahba A, Stølen T, Contu R, Condorelli G, Ellingsen Ø, Smith G, Kemi O and Wisløff U (2018) Human cardiomyocyte calcium handling and transverse tubules in mid-stage of post-myocardial-infarction heart failure, ESC Heart Failure, 10.1002/ehf2.12271, 5:3, (332-342), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018. Alvarado F and Valdivia H (2018) Inheritable Phenotypes Associated With Altered Intracellular Calcium Regulation Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside, 10.1016/B978-0-323-44733-1.00053-5, (504-512), . Bovo E, Huke S, Blatter L and Zima A (2017) The effect of PKA-mediated phosphorylation of ryanodine receptor on SR Ca2+ leak in ventricular myocytes, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.01.015, 104, (9-16), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017. Alvarado F, Chen X and Valdivia H (2017) Ablation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor phospho-site Ser2808 does not alter the adrenergic response or the progression to heart failure in mice. Elimination of the genetic background as critical variable, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.01.001, 103, (40-47), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017. Gómez A, Mesquita T, Mercadier J, Álvarez J and Benitah J (2017) Calcium Microdomains in Cardiac Cells Microdomains in the Cardiovascular System, 10.1007/978-3-319-54579-0_17, (361-386), . Ho H, Belevych A, Liu B, Bonilla I, Radwański P, Kubasov I, Valdivia H, Schober K, Carnes C and Györke S (2016) Muscarinic Stimulation Facilitates Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca Release by Modulating Ryanodine Receptor 2 Phosphorylation Through Protein Kinase G and Ca/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II, Hypertension, 68:5, (1171-1178), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016. Khavandi K, Baylie R, Sugden S, Ahmed M, Csato V, Eaton P, Hill-Eubanks D, Bonev A, Nelson M and Greenstein A (2016) Pressure-induced oxidative activation of PKG enables vasoregulation by Ca 2+ sparks and BK channels , Science Signaling, 10.1126/scisignal.aaf6625, 9:449, Online publication date: 11-Oct-2016. Rajapreyar I, Ennezat P and Le Jemtel T (2014) Toward Safe Inotropic Therapy, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000114, 64:4, (385-392), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. Guerrero-Hernández A, Ávila G and Rueda A (2014) Ryanodine receptors as leak channels, European Journal of Pharmacology, 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.11.016, 739, (26-38), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2014. Rueda A, de Alba-Aguayo D and Valdivia H (2014) Receptor de rianodina, fuga de calcio y arritmias, Archivos de Cardiología de México, 10.1016/j.acmx.2013.12.008, 84:3, (191-201), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014. Zima A, Bovo E, Mazurek S, Rochira J, Li W and Terentyev D (2014) Ca handling during excitation–contraction coupling in heart failure, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 10.1007/s00424-014-1469-3, 466:6, (1129-1137), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014. Camors E and Valdivia H (2014) CaMKII regulation of cardiac ryanodine receptors and inositol triphosphate receptors, Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10.3389/fphar.2014.00101, 5 Heijman J, Voigt N, Nattel S and Dobrev D (2014) Cellular and Molecular Electrophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation Initiation, Maintenance, and Progression, Circulation Research, 114:9, (1483-1499), Online publication date: 25-Apr-2014.Dobrev D and Wehrens X (2014) Role of RyR2 Phosphorylation in Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Circulation Research, 114:8, (1311-1319), Online publication date: 11-Apr-2014. Høydal M, Stølen T, Johnsen A, Alvez M, Catalucci D, Condorelli G, Koch L, Britton S, Smith G and Wisløff U (2014) Reduced aerobic capacity causes leaky ryanodine receptors that trigger arrhythmia in a rat strain artificially selected and bred for low aerobic running capacity, Acta Physiologica, 10.1111/apha.12238, 210:4, (854-864), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2014. Valdivia H (2014) Structural and Molecular Bases of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ion Channel Function Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside, 10.1016/B978-1-4557-2856-5.00006-6, (55-69), . Gutierrez D, Fernandez-Tenorio M, Ogrodnik J and Niggli E (2013) NO-dependent CaMKII activation during β-adrenergic stimulation of cardiac muscle, Cardiovascular Research, 10.1093/cvr/cvt201, 100:3, (392-401), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013., Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013. Bovo E, Dvornikov A, Mazurek S, de Tombe P and Zima A (2013) Mechanisms of Ca2+ handling in zebrafish ventricular myocytes, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 10.1007/s00424-013-1312-2, 465:12, (1775-1784), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013. Belevych A, Radwański P, Carnes C and Györke S (2013) ‘Ryanopathy’: causes and manifestations of RyR2 dysfunction in heart failure, Cardiovascular Research, 10.1093/cvr/cvt024, 98:2, (240-247), Online publication date: 1-May-2013., Online publication date: 1-May-2013. Niggli E, Ullrich N, Gutierrez D, Kyrychenko S, Poláková E and Shirokova N (2013) Posttranslational modifications of cardiac ryanodine receptors: Ca2+ signaling and EC-coupling, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.08.016, 1833:4, (866-875), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013. Loaiza R, Benkusky N, Powers P, Hacker T, Noujaim S, Ackerman M, Jalife J and Valdivia H (2012) Heterogeneity of Ryanodine Receptor Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia, Circulation Research, 112:2, (298-308), Online publication date: 18-Jan-2013. Zima A and Terentyev D (2013) Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca Homeostasis and Heart Failure Biophysics of the Failing Heart, 10.1007/978-1-4614-7678-8_2, (5-36), . May 25, 2012Vol 110, Issue 11 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.270876PMID: 22628571 Originally publishedMay 25, 2012 Keywordscalcium signalingryanodine receptorsarcoplasmic reticulumheart failurePDF download Advertisement