A new way for isolation and cultivation of sweat gland ductual cells from human split-thickness skin in vitro
Yong-hong LEI,Xiao-bing FU,Zhi-yong SHENG,Sa CAI,Tong-zhu SUN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2009.20.016
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore a new method of isolation and culture of eccrine sweat gland ductual cells from human split-thickness skin graft in vitro. Methods Human split-thickness skin graft which was presented by volunteer (n=10) was digested with type Ⅱ collagenase, and then sweat gland duct were isolated from the split-thickness skin graft, primary cultures were incubated at 37 ℃ in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO_2,95% O_2. The cultured eccrine sweat gland ductual cells were identified by analysis CEA, CKB, CK18, CK19 antigens expression with flow cytometry, RT-PCR and Western Blot, and by detecting the electrophysialogy with whole cell patch clamp technology. Results The isolated eccrine sweat gland ductual cells could grow by adhering to the wall, proliferate in vitro after 48 h of adhering to the wall, and confluens after 2-4weeks of adhering to the wall. The FACs analysis showed the expression of CEA was (90.26±1.12)%, (89.70±1.43)%, and CK8 was (94.41±1.84)%, (93.65±1.63)% in primary cultured sweat gland ductual cells and primary cultured eccrine sweat gland cells, repectively, and there is no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Immunocytochemistry staining showed CEA,CK8,CK18,CK19 was positive in sweat gland duct cells, RT-PCR revealed that CEA, CKB, CK18 and CK19 gene expression in sweat gland ductual cells, and Western Blot analysis showed the expression of CEA brand,CK8 brand,CK18 brand,and CK19 brand in sweat gland ductual cells, patch clamp indicated that this cells has distinct amiloride sensitive Na+ channels. Conclusions The cultured human eccrine sweat gland duct cells in vitro display the markers and biological characteristics of sweat gland epithelial lineage, and this method of digest the split-thickness skin graft to get the sweat gland duct cells is better than classical dissect sweat gland under dissect microscope.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?