Abstract:Learning to rank, which learns the ranking function from training data, has become an emerging research area in information retrieval and machine learning. Most existing work on learning to rank assumes that the training data is clean, which is not always true, however. The ambiguity of query intent, the lack of domain knowledge, and the vague definition of relevance levels all make it difficult for common annotators to give reliable relevance labels to some documents. As a result, the relevance labels in the training data of learning to rank usually contain noise. If we ignore this fact, the performance of learning-to-rank algorithms will be damaged. In this article, we propose considering the labeling noise in the process of learning to rank and using a two-step approach to extend existing algorithms to handle noisy training data. In the first step, we estimate the degree of labeling noise for a training document. To this end, we assume that the majority of the relevance labels in the training data are reliable and we use a graphical model to describe the generative process of a training query, the feature vectors of its associated documents, and the relevance labels of these documents. The parameters in the graphical model are learned by means of maximum likelihood estimation. Then the conditional probability of the relevance label given the feature vector of a document is computed. If the probability is large, we regard the degree of labeling noise for this document as small; otherwise, we regard the degree as large. In the second step, we extend existing learning-to-rank algorithms by incorporating the estimated degree of labeling noise into their loss functions. Specifically, we give larger weights to those training documents with smaller degrees of labeling noise and smaller weights to those with larger degrees of labeling noise. As examples, we demonstrate the extensions for McRank, RankSVM, RankBoost, and RankNet. Empirical results on benchmark datasets show that the proposed approach can effectively distinguish noisy documents from clean ones, and the extended learning-to-rank algorithms can achieve better performances than baselines.

Which noise affects algorithm robustness for learning to rank

What Makes Data Robust

Learning to Rank from Noisy Data

A Noise-Tolerant Graphical Model for Ranking

Noise tolerance of learning to rank under class-conditional label noise

Noise is the Fatal Poison: A Noise-aware Network for Noisy Dataset Classification

PeerRank: Robust Learning to Rank with Peer Loss over Noisy Labels

Class Noise Vs. Attribute Noise: A Quantitative Study

NoiseRank: Unsupervised Label Noise Reduction with Dependence Models

Analyze the Robustness of Classifiers under Label Noise

Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations

Robustness and Reliability When Training With Noisy Labels

Noise Resistant Graph Ranking for Improved Web Image Search

A study of the effect of different types of noise on the precision of supervised learning techniques

Which Strategies Matter for Noisy Label Classification? Insight into Loss and Uncertainty

Active Learning for Web Search Ranking via Noise Injection

Modeling Noisy Annotations for Point-wise Supervision

Improve Noise Tolerance of Robust Loss via Noise-Awareness

Selecting optimal training data for learning to rank

NoisyAG-News: A Benchmark for Addressing Instance-Dependent Noise in Text Classification