Abstract:Spatial group independent component analysis (GICA) methods decompose multiple-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data into a linear mixture of spatially independent components (ICs), some of which are subsequently characterized as brain functional networks. Group information guided independent component analysis (GIG-ICA) as a variant of GICA has been proposed to improve the accuracy of the subject-specific ICs estimation by optimizing their independence. Independent vector analysis (IVA) is another method which optimizes the independence among each subject's components and the dependence among corresponding components of different subjects. Both methods are promising in neuroimaging study and showed a better performance than the traditional GICA. However, the difference between IVA and GIG-ICA has not been well studied. A detailed comparison between them is demanded to provide guidance for functional network analyses. In this work, we employed multiple simulations to evaluate the performances of the two approaches in estimating subject-specific components and time courses under conditions of different data quality and quantity, varied number of sources generated and inaccurate number of components used in computation, as well as the presence of spatially subject-unique sources. We also compared the two methods using healthy subjects' test-retest resting-state fMRI data in terms of spatial functional networks and functional network connectivity (FNC). Results from simulations support that GIG-ICA showed better recovery accuracy of both components and time courses than IVA for those subject-common sources, and IVA outperformed GIG-ICA in component and time course estimation for the subject-unique sources. Results from real fMRI data suggest that GIG-ICA resulted in more reliable spatial functional networks and yielded higher and more robust modularity property of FNC, compared to IVA. Taken together, GIG-ICA is appropriate for estimating networks which are consistent across subjects, while IVA is able to estimate networks with great inter-subject variability or subject-unique property.

Comparison of three group ICA methods for multi-subject fMRI data analysis

The Application of Independent Component Analysis with Projection Method to Two-Task Fmri Data over Multiple Subjects

Subject Order-Independent Group ICA (SOI-GICA) for Functional MRI Data Analysis

Separating 4D Multi-Task Fmri Data of Multiple Subjects by Independent Component Analysis with Projection.

Temporally and Spatially Constrained ICA of Fmri Data Analysis

Comparison of TCA and ICA techniques in fMRI data processing.

Spatial Independent Component Analysis Of Multitask-Related Activation In Fmri Data

Multi-subject Fmri Analysis Via Combined Independent Component Analysis and Shift-Invariant Canonical Polyadic Decomposition

Comparing the Reliability of Different ICA Algorithms for Fmri Analysis.

Grouping individual independent BOLD effects: a new way to ICA group analysis

A New Post-Processing Method of Applying Independent Component Analysis to Fmri Data

Spatial Independent Component Analysis for Multi-task Functional MRI Data Processing

A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data

An Empirical Comparison Of Information-Theoretic Criteria In Estimating The Number Of Independent Components Of Fmri Data

The Application of Spatial Independent Component Analysis in Fmri Data

Comparison of IVA and GIG-ICA in Brain Functional Network Estimation Using Fmri Data.

Non-Inferential Multi-Subject Study of Functional Connectivity during Visual Stimulation

Discussion on the choice of separated components in fMRI data analysis by spatial independent component analysis

Unified SPM-ICA for fMRI analysis.

Independent Component Analysis Method in Brain Image Data

The Improvement of ICA with Projection Technique in Multitask Fmri Data Analysis