STAT1 (signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1) Deficiency in T Cells Upregulates MHC Class II and Co‐stimulation Receptors, Suggesting That STAT1 Deficiency in T Cells May Increase the Plasticity and Convert in to Atypical Antigen Presenting Cells
William Y. Yang,Haitao Shen,Na Wu,Gayani K. Nanayakkara,Hangfei Fu,Charles Drummer,Ying Shao,LuQiao Wang,Qian Yang,Keman Xu,Wenhui Hu,Eric T. Choi,Hong Wang,Xiaofeng Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.771.4
2018-01-01
Abstract:It is well known that antigen presenting cells (APC) express co‐stimulation receptors (CSR) and co‐inhibition receptors (CIR) that play important roles in modulating T cell activation status. The CSR and CIR can affect priming, T‐helper (Th) cell differentiation, effector and memory function of T‐cells. However, the issue of whether the types and number of APCs vary across different tissues is not known. Therefore, we hypothesize that the types and number of APCs vary across different tissues, which create different stimulatory/suppressive environments depending on the tissues and determine the four functional aspects of T cells mentioned above. Therefore, to validate this hypothesis, we conducted an extensive data mining study. In our analysis, we included 14 CSRs and 14 CIRs. Our study revealed following interesting findings. 1) The CSRs and CIRs are differentially expressed in human tissues. Amongst all the co‐stimulation receptors included in our analysis, CSRs such as CD40, CD48, HVEM and B7‐H2 are highly expressed in many types of human tissues. SEMA4A is the only CIR that is highly expressed in human tissues. Moreover, lymph node, placenta, thymus and trachea had the highest co‐stimulation and co‐inhibition potential. 2) Two CSRs including CD40 and CD70 can affect all the four functional aspects of T‐cells. CSRs such as CD48, CD58, TL1A, OX40L, LGHT, B7‐H2 and one co‐inhibition receptor (CIR) Galectin 9 regulates only three functions of T‐cells. 3) Co‐signaling potential varies between tissues, therefore T‐cell functions may undergo differential regulation. 4) Human tumors have increased co‐stimulation potential than correlated healthy human tissues. This may predict the improved prognosis of patients with tumor. 5) Inflammasome components and tissue hyper‐/hypo‐methylation status can significantly regulate the expression of co‐stimulation receptors in the tissues. 6) STAT1 deficiency in T cells upregulates MHC class II and co‐stimulation Receptor. This suggest that STAT1 deficiency in T cells may increase the plasticity and promote the conversion of T‐cells into APCs. Based on our findings, we conclude that tissue environment can regulate the expression of co‐stimulation receptors, and thereby significantly affect the functions of T‐cells; and key transcription factors such as STAT1 not only plays important roles in regulating cytokine pathways and T cell function, but also determine T cell identity and roles of atypical T cells in immune responses.Support or Funding InformationRO1 ‐ HL132399‐01A1This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.