Variations in Atmospheric Co2 Growth Rates Coupled with Tropical Temperature

Weile Wang,Philippe Ciais,Ramakrishna R. Nemani,Josep G. Canadell,Shilong Piao,Stephen Sitch,Michael A. White,Hirofumi Hashimoto,Cristina Milesi,Ranga B. Myneni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219683110
IF: 11.1
2013-01-01
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Previous studies have highlighted the occurrence and intensity of El Niño–Southern Oscillation as important drivers of the interannual variability of the atmospheric CO 2 growth rate, but the underlying biogeophysical mechanisms governing such connections remain unclear. Here we show a strong and persistent coupling ( r 2 ≈ 0.50) between interannual variations of the CO 2 growth rate and tropical land–surface air temperature during 1959 to 2011, with a 1 °C tropical temperature anomaly leading to a 3.5 ± 0.6 Petagrams of carbon per year (PgC/y) CO 2 growth-rate anomaly on average. Analysis of simulation results from Dynamic Global Vegetation Models suggests that this temperature–CO 2 coupling is contributed mainly by the additive responses of heterotrophic respiration (Rh) and net primary production (NPP) to temperature variations in tropical ecosystems. However, we find a weaker and less consistent ( r 2 ≈ 0.25) interannual coupling between CO 2 growth rate and tropical land precipitation than diagnosed from the Dynamic Global Vegetation Models, likely resulting from the subtractive responses of tropical Rh and NPP to precipitation anomalies that partly offset each other in the net ecosystem exchange (i.e., net ecosystem exchange ≈ Rh − NPP). Variations in other climate variables (e.g., large-scale cloudiness) and natural disturbances (e.g., volcanic eruptions) may induce transient reductions in the temperature–CO 2 coupling, but the relationship is robust during the past 50 y and shows full recovery within a few years after any such major variability event. Therefore, it provides an important diagnostic tool for improved understanding of the contemporary and future global carbon cycle.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?