COMMITMENTAND OBLIGATIONBASEDON UTILITYINAGENT ORGANIZATION
Xiaohui Liang
2006-01-01
Abstract:andthen, undertake thecorresponding Itisimportant todesign anagent withlogical and obligations toaccomplish thegoals. Ontheother hand, decisive rationality inagent organization. Recent studyfromtheviewofdecisive rationality, theevaluation of aboutorganization focuses onthedefinition ofagentthegoal benefit andcostfromsocial andindividual organization modelandtheanalysis oforganization perspectives alsoinfluences thechoices ofgiven goals formation andevolution, anattractive andchallenging fortheagent(9). Itisnecessary tointegrate logic and issue ishowtocombine logical anddecisive rationality decision intoagent organization model, inwhich, from into auniform framework. This paperaimsatarguingthedeontic aspect, commitment andobligation arethe thecombination withlogic anddecision inagenttypical logic notions (e.g. typical workin(2), (3) and(5)). organization. Topursue this aim,weextend thenotions There areseveral typical researches that focus onthe ofcommitment andobligation withutility inagentdefinition ofcommitment andobligation (1),(2),(3), (16), organization andutility reflects agent decision. Inorderonhowtoformthembetween agents intheorganizations tosystematize thenotions, formal tools areintroduced to (5),(7),(8), onextending BDIagent withutility (14),(15) describe themaswellasthesemantics ofutility for andformalizing these inanorganization structure (4). A commitment andobligation aredefined Wespecify the typical organization structure includes agents, groups and properties andconsequences oftheextension foragentroles (6), inwhichroles specify a setoffunctions or organization. services provided bytheorganizations, forexample, they involve organizational goals, necessary resourcesand