Abstract:To study the impact of bus priority control (BPC) on traffic carbon emissions under the strategies of speed guidance, green extension (GE), and red truncation (RT), with consideration of the main influencing factors such as delay, stopping times, and speed, a combination optimization method was used to develop a bi-level optimization model for BPC. The optimal carbon-emission reductions of buses and social vehicles with different fuel types in the upstream section of the intersection and the intersection control area was the upper-level objective, and the optimal total passenger-delay reduction was the lower-level objective. The Gauss – Seidel iterative algorithm was used to solve the model. Finally, the model was applied to the analysis of calculation cases. The results indicated that after BPC was adopted under the guidance acceleration strategy, the reductions in the carbon emissions and total delay of passenger were optimal when the guidance speed was 38 km/h, i.e. 12.67% and 21.05%, respectively. Under the guidance acceleration and GE strategy, the reductions in the carbon emissions and total delay of passenger were optimal when the guidance speed was 39 km/h and the GE was 6 s, i.e. 27.49% and 38.62%, respectively. Under the guidance deceleration and RT strategy, the reductions in the carbon emissions and total delay of passenger were optimal when the guidance speed was 29 km/h and the RT was 6 s, i.e. 22.18% and 33.52%, respectively. The model reduced the carbon emissions and total delay of passenger in the upstream section of the intersection and the intersection control area to achieve the optimal overall traffic benefit for the intersection. Two bus signal priority control strategies – green extension and red truncation – were studied. Carbon emission and delay calculation methods under the bus priority control were developed. Considering carbon-emission reductions of buses and social vehicles with different fuel types under different working conditions. Three control methods were studied: guidance acceleration, guidance acceleration and green extension, and guidance deceleration and red truncation.

A Research on Strategy of Bus Priority

Bus signal priority method at arterial signal progression

Bus Priority Signal Control for Signalized Intersection without Bus Lane

Multiple-Phase Bus Signal Priority Strategy for Arterial Coordination Intersection

Control Strategies for Transit Priority Based on Queue Modeling and Surrogate Testing

Conditional Active and Passive Bus Signal Priority Strategies Considering Saturation Degree Restriction at an Isolated Junction

Proactive Coordination of Traffic Guidance and Signal Control for a Divergent Network

Optimal control to improve reliability of demand responsive transport priority at signalized intersections considering the stochastic process

Multi-agent Fuzzy Signal Control with Bus Priority

Multi-phase bus signal priority strategy at isolated intersections

Development and Evaluation of a Passive Bus Signal Priority Algorithm at Isolated Intersection

An adaptive pre-signal setting to provide bus priority under a coordinated traffic-responsive network

Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Urban Bus Priority Development Strategy

An Approach of Transit Passive Priority with Transit Phase Overlapped at Intersection of Arterial Signal Progression

Dynamic Right-of-Way Allocation on Bus Priority Lanes Considering Traffic System Resilience

Simulation analysis of traffic signal control and transit signal priority strategies under Arterial Coordination Conditions

DRL-based adaptive signal control for bus priority service under connected vehicle environment

Providing Bus Priority Using Adaptive Pre-signals

An Application Attempt of Transit Signal Priority in Urban Arterial

Optimization model for bus priority control considering carbon emissions

Optimal signal-planning method of intersections based on bus priority