Bipartite Ramsey numbers of cycles
Zilong Yan,Yuejian Peng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2024.103921
IF: 0.89
2024-05-01
European Journal of Combinatorics
Abstract:Let H 1 , …, H k be bipartite graphs. The bipartite Ramsey number b r ( H 1 , … , H k ) is the minimum integer N such that any k -edge-coloring of the complete bipartite graph K N , N contains a monochromatic H i in color i for some i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , k } . The study of bipartite Ramsey number was initiated in the early 70s by Faudree and Schelp (1975), and they showed that b r ( P 2 n , P 2 m ) = n + m − 1 , where P n denotes a path with n vertices. Combining their result and the regularity lemma, one can obtain asymptotic value b r ( C 2 ⌊ α 1 n ⌋ , C 2 ⌊ α 2 n ⌋ ) = ( α 1 + α 2 + o ( 1 ) ) n for α 1 , α 2 > 0 , where C n denotes a cycle with n vertices. The study of bipartite Ramsey numbers of cycles has also attracted lots of attention recently. For example, Bucić, Letzter and Sudakov (2019) showed that b r ( C 2 n , C 2 n , C 2 n ) = ( 3 + o ( 1 ) ) n and they remarked that it is interesting to determine the exact value of b r ( C 2 n , C 2 m ) . Zhang and Sun (2011), Zhang, Sun, and Wu (2013), and Gholami and Rowshan (2021) determined b r ( C 4 , C 2 n ) , b r ( C 6 , C 2 n ) , and b r ( C 8 , C 2 n ) respectively. In this paper, we determine b r ( C 2 n , C 2 m ) for all the remaining cases and show that b r ( C 2 n , C 2 m ) = n + m − 1 for all n > m ≥ 5 and b r ( C 2 n , C 2 n ) = 2 n if n ≥ 5 . It is somehow interesting that b r ( C 2 n , C 2 m ) is the same as b r ( P 2 n , P 2 m ) if n ≠ m , and b r ( C 2 n , C 2 n ) is one more than b r ( P 2 n , P 2 n ) .
mathematics