Abstract:Background The back‐projection strategies such as confidence weighting (CW) and most likely annihilation position (MLAP) have been adopted into back‐projection‐and‐filtering‐like (BPF‐like) deep reconstruction model and shown great potential on fast and accurate PET reconstruction. Although the two methods degenerate to an identical model at the time resolution of 0 ps, they represent two distinct approaches at the realistic time resolutions of current commercial systems. There is a lack of a systematic and fair assessment on these differences. Purpose This work aims to analyze the impact of back‐projection variants on CNN‐based PET image reconstruction to find the most effective back‐projection model, and ultimately contribute to accurate PET reconstruction. Methods Different back‐projection strategies (CW and MLAP) and different angular view processing methods (view‐summed and view‐grouped) were considered, leading to the comparison of four back‐projection variants integrated with the same CNN filtration model. Meanwhile, we investigated two strategies of physical effect compensation, either introducing pre‐corrected data as the input or adding a channel of attenuation map to the CNN model. After training models separately on Monte‐Carlo‐simulated BrainWeb phantoms with full dose (events = 3×107), we tested them on both simulated phantoms and clinical brain scans with two dosage levels. For the performance assessment, peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR) and root mean square error (RMSE) were used to evaluate the pixel‐wise error, structural similarity index (SSIM) to evaluate the structural similarity, and contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) in manually selected ROI to compare the region recovery. Results Compared to two MLAP‐based histo‐image reconstruction models, two CW‐based back‐projected image methods produced clearer, sharper, and more detailed images, from both simulated and clinical data. For angular view processing methods, view‐grouped histo‐image improved image quality, while view‐grouped cwbp‐image showed no advantage except for contrast recovery. Quantitative analysis on simulated data demonstrated that the view‐summed cwbp‐image model achieved the best PSNR, RMSE, SSIM, while the 8‐view cwbp‐image model achieved the best CRC in lesions and the white matter. Additionally, the multi‐channel input model including the back‐projection image and attenuation map was proved to be the most efficient and simplest method for compensating for physical effects for brain data. Applying Gaussian blur to the histo‐image yielded images with limited improvement. All above results hold for both the half‐dose and the full‐dose cases. Conclusion For brain imaging, the evaluation based on metrics PSNR, RMSE, SSIM, and CRC indicates that the view‐summed CW‐based back‐projection variant is the most effective input for the BPF‐like reconstruction model using CNN filtration, which can involve the attenuation map through an additional channel to effectively compensate for physical effects.

Evaluation of Filter Function for Volume PET Imaging Using the 3DRP Algorithm

HF-SENSE: an Improved Partially Parallel Imaging Using a High-Pass Filter

A Noise Reduction Method for Non-Stationary Noise Model of SPECT Sinogram Based on Kalman Filter

A Comparison of Four-Image Reconstruction Algorithms for 3-D Pet Imaging of Mdapet Camera Using Phantom Data

3D Distance-Weighted Wiener Filter for Poisson Noise Reduction in Sinogram Space for SPECT Imaging

Optimal filtering strategies for task-specific functional PET imaging

An Exact Fourier Rebinning Algorithm for 3D PET Imaging Using Panel Detectors.

PET image reconstruction: a robust state space approach.

Guided Block Matching and 4-D Transform Domain Filter Projection Denoising Method for Dynamic PET Image Reconstruction

Graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated particle filter framework for positron emission tomography image reconstruction.

Low Dose PET Image Reconstruction with Total Variation Using Alternating Direction Method.

Multiple Reconstructions with Different Data Quality for a Single Scan Using Kernel Method in Digital PET

Fast Implementation and Quantitative Evaluation of Analytical Methods with Wiener Filters for Image Reconstruction in 3D SPECT

PET Image Reconstruction from Finite Linogram Via Direct Fourier and Logarithmic Barrier Method

Evaluation of the 3D IMF-OSEM Algorithm by Using Data from a High Resolution PET Scanner

An adaptive filtered back-projection for photoacoustic image reconstruction

The effects of back‐projection variants in BPF‐like TOF PET reconstruction using CNN filtration – Based on simulated and clinical brain data

ROI Reconstruction of Motion-Contaminated Data with a Backprojection Filtration Algorithm

Accurate Image Reconstruction with Computed System Response Matrix for a High-Sensitivity Dual-Head PET Scanner

A backprojection kernel (KRNL3D) for very-wide-aperture 3D tomography applied to PET with Multigrid for precise use of time-of-flight data

Median-prior tomography reconstruction combined with nonlinear anisotropic diffusion filtering.