Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the combined effects of different modalities of long-term knowledge accumulation and short-term knowledge searching on the generation of high-impact ideas. The authors aim at providing useful conclusions for academic scholars.Design/methodology/approach - Two dimensions of the cumulative knowledge structures of researchers are measured: knowledge depth and knowledge breadth. The search strategies employed by researchers are classified as local search and distant search. The authors use researchers' historical publications to measure cumulative knowledge structures. References contained in these publications serve as an indicator of knowledge searching behaviors and are used to measure search strategies. Highly cited papers with random-but-matched papers from the same journal published in the same year are adopted to test the hypotheses.Findings - The knowledge depth of researchers positively predicts the generation of high-impact ideas. Knowledge breadth has a bell-shaped relationship to the generation of high-impact ideas. Two instances of "strategic fit" between the knowledge structures and search strategies of researchers are identified; namely, knowledge breadth combines most effectively with local search, and knowledge depth combines most effectively with distant search in generating high-impact ideas.Research limitations/implications - Using article references to measure authors' knowledge search behaviors may lead to biases. Future research should perform a survey to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the knowledge search behaviors of scholars. Practical implications - A "T-shaped" knowledge structure in the long run is recommended for maximal generation of high-impact ideas. Researchers who have not adopted this optimal knowledge structure can employ a matched search strategy to leverage their existing knowledge structures.Originality/value - This paper is among the first to examine the interactive effects between the cumulative knowledge structures and short-term knowledge searching strategies of researchers. The authors have enriched the exploration and exploitation theory by adding the dimension of time into the analysis.

Where do breakthrough ideas come from? Characteristics of scientists' research behaviors

Comparing Breakthrough and Non-Breakthrough Papers from Early Citing Structures.

Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics

Predicting Scientific Breakthroughs Based on Knowledge Structure Variations

Untangle the Characteristics of Disruptive and Consolidating Citations of Nobel‐winning Papers

Surprising combinations of research contents and contexts are related to impact and emerge with scientific outsiders from distant disciplines

Remote Collaboration Fuses Fewer Breakthrough Ideas

Cautious explorers generate more future academic impact

Identifying citation patterns of scientific breakthroughs: A perspective of dynamic citation process

Citing for High Impact

Relying on recent and temporally dispersed science predicts breakthrough inventions

Science as Exploration in a Knowledge Landscape: Tracing Hotspots or Seeking Opportunity?

Creativity in Science and the Link to Cited References: Is the Creative Potential of Papers Reflected in their Cited References?

Initial Burst of Disruptive Efforts Ensuring Scientific Career Viability

Science and Technology Advance through Surprise

Inspiration or Preparation? Explaining Creativity in Scientific Enterprise

Dynamics and characteristics of interdisciplinary research in scientific breakthroughs: case studies of Nobel-winning research in the past 120 years

Where Do High-Impact Ideas Come From? the Interplay Between the Cumulative Knowledge Structures and Search Strategies of Researchers

Is scientific novelty reflected in citation patterns?: Is Scientific Novelty Reflected in Citation Patterns?

The relationship between interdisciplinarity and citation impact-a novel perspective on citation accumulation