Repeated risky choices become more consistent with themselves but not expected value, with no effect of matched trial order

Jake Spicer,Timothy L. Mullett,Adam N. Sanborn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2023.41

2024-01-01

Judgment and decision making

Abstract:Abstract Choices made in risky scenarios are considered fundamentally noisy because decisions have often been found to be inconsistent when repeated. Past measures of noise may, however, be confounded by the use of randomized contextual factors that are known to influence choice, in particular, the order of trials. In two experiments, we control trial order to test the extent to which inconsistent choice is attributable to changes in experimental context. Both tasks find strong evidence that trial order has no effect on choice consistency, indicating such experimental factors have little influence on behavior compared with internal noise. Choices also showed an increase in consistency across multiple repetitions, suggesting a fall in noise with experience, but this increase was not associated with any improvement in performance, with choices showing no greater adherence to either expected value or expected utility across repetitions. Instead, choices increasingly adhered to simplistic heuristic decision rules, possibly indicating greater reliance on such strategies as the tasks progressed. These results carry implications for a number of decision-making theories, including true-and-error models, rank-based methods, and strategy shift approaches.

psychology, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether the consistency of choices in repeated risky decision - making is affected by external factors of the experiment (such as the order of trials), and whether this consistency will change with the increase of experience. Specifically, by controlling the order of trials, the researchers test whether inconsistent choices are mainly attributed to changes in the experimental environment or more caused by internal noise (i.e., the internal uncertainty or randomness of decision - makers). In addition, the study also explores whether the consistency of choices will improve with the repetition of tasks, and if so, whether this means that participants are more likely to follow specific decision - making strategies, such as expected value or expected utility.

The main objectives of the paper can be summarized as follows:

1. **Examine the influence of external factors on choice consistency**: By controlling the order of trials, the researchers hope to determine whether these external factors significantly affect the decision - making consistency of participants.
2. **Explore the change of choice consistency over time**: The researchers let participants perform the same decision - making task multiple times to observe whether the consistency of choices will increase with the accumulation of experience.
3. **Analyze the change of decision - making strategies**: The researchers also evaluate whether participants' choices are more likely to follow certain specific decision - making rules, such as expected value or simple heuristic strategies, in order to understand the reasons for the increase in choice consistency.

These objectives aim to deepen the understanding of the roles of internal noise and external factors in the risky decision - making process and provide empirical support for the development of decision - making theory.