Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiographic results of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using jumbo cups in Chinese patients. Methods: We retrospectively studied 61 patients (63 hips; 29 men [30 hips], 32 women [33 hips]) who underwent acetabular revision with jumbo cups between January 2001 and April 2016 at our institution. The mean age at the index operation was 59.4 ± 11.4 years. The mean body mass index of the patients was 24.9 ± 3.8 kg/m2 . Clinical evaluation was determined using the Harris hip score preoperatively and at follow up. Major complications (including instability, sepsis, and revision of the femoral or acetabular component) were recorded. Radiographic measurements included inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular components, and the vertical and horizontal distances of the centers of rotation (V-COR and H-COR, respectively). In the 42 patients with normal contralateral hip joints, the postoperative V-COR and H-COR were compared between right and left sides. Their improvement in leg-length discrepancy (LLD) after revision THA was also evaluated. Cup survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed. Results: Mean follow up was 5.7 years (2-16 years). At the latest follow-up, the average Harris hip score (preoperative vs postoperative values) had improved from 46 to 83 (P < 0.001). No acetabular component was radiographically defined as loosened. Four hips (6.3%) had major complications: one hip was revised because of periprosthetic infection (at 3 months); one underwent femoral open reduction and internal fixation (with implant retention) because of a periprosthetic femoral fracture (at 13 months); one operated hip developed a deep infection (at 2.5 years), which was treated with antibiotics; one hip experienced recurrent dislocation (at 4.5 years). The average cup inclination angle was 40.8° ± 6.8° and the average anteversion angle was 14.9° ± 6.6°. Average V-COR decreased from 29.7 ± 10.4 mm to 22.3 ± 7.6 mm (P < 0.001). The average postoperative H-COR was 29.5 ± 3.7 mm compared with 30.8 ± 6.6 mm preoperatively (P = 0.145). Among the 42 patients with normal contralateral hips, the average postoperative V-COR were 22.2 ± 8.3 mm (operated side) and 14.0 ± 3.7 mm (contralateral side) (P < 0.001). LLD improved from -16.8 ± 17.1 mm to -5.6 ± 11.8 mm (P < 0.001). When failure was defined as any reoperation involving the hip, the mean 16-year hip survival was 96.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.9%-99.2%). When defined as any hip reoperation or major complication, it was 92.7% (95%CI 81.2%-97.2%). Conclusion: Use of jumbo cups for revision THA resulted in excellent mid-term cup survival and helped restore the COR.

The Use of Morselized Allografts Without Impaction and Cemented Cage Support in Acetabular Revision Surgery: a 4- to 9-Year Follow-Up

Selection of Allografts for Impaction Bone Grafting for Bone Defect Reconstruction on the Acetabular Side.

Acetabular Revision Using an Anti-Protrusion Cage in Patients with Periprosthetic Acetabular Bone Loss

Titanium Wire Mesh and Impact Bone Allograft in Treating Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Combined Use of Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Components with Onlay Cortical Strut Allografts in Revision of Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Biomechanical Research on Contour Cage with Transacetabular Screws Fixation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Progress on the investigation of BMP application in revision total hip arthroplasty

[Acetabular revision using acetabular reinforcement cages with a hook].

Structural Bone-Grafting with Uncemented Cup for Acetabular Deficiency and Reconstruction

Using Porous Tantalum Uncemented Components to Manage Acetabular Defects and to Restore the Hip Center of Rotation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum Ten-Year Clinical and Radiological Study

Pure Alumina Bearings with Cementless Stems Versus Sandwich Bearings with Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Long-term outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting with cemented cups and trabecular metal for revision hip arthroplasty: a follow-up study

Evaluation and Management of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-year Update

Mid-Term Follow-Up of Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using Jumbo Cups

Intermediate outcomes of alumina-on-alumina bearing total hip arthroplastyTotal arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Ceramic; Frictione; Prostheses and implants

Application of Jumbo Cup in Acetabular Revisions for Patients with Massive Acetabular Bone Deficiency

Both Acetabular and Femoral Reconstructions With Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review

[Intermediate Outcomes of Alumina-on-alumina Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasty].

Management of Acetabular Bone Loss in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: Case Series Presentation

The 10-Year Outcomes of the ASR XL Acetabular System: a Single-Center Experience from China.

Does the Cementless, Hydroxyapatite on Porous, Long-stem Prosthesis Perform Well in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Multicenter Observation.