Abstract:This paper presents a sociological analysis of Tibetan language policy issues in China during the 1951–2020 period from a sociological perspective, while also attempting to portray the complex situations in which the same language is used in communication and interactions within sub-marginally demarcated societies where the same macrosocial structure is shared by traditions but the microsocial structure has been fragmented by the embedded social system, posing the risk of social structural collapse through social change stemming from language problems. In this analysis, Cooper’s model is applied to the Tibetan context of language status planning and social change while examining the process of how China’s language policy is to replace the Tibetan language, resulting in forms of social change. The results of this examination emphasise the need for multifarious reconciliation, not a single language policy issue, in sustaining the future identity of Tibetan populations (See Table 1).Table 1Comparison of different Tibetan dialects and regions where these are spokenRegionsP & DPopulationDialectU-TsangTAR2,096,346U-Tsang DialectKhamYunnan126,618 (2010, census)Kham DialectSichuan1,087,510Garzê Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture (population 880,000), 78.37% of residents speak Kham dialect; and in Muli Tibetan Autonomous County (population 40,312) about 32.39% of Tibetan residents speak Kham DialectTibetan population in Aba Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture (455,238, 53), and 72% of whom speak Amdo dialectAmdoQinghai911,860From total population of Tibetans in Qinghai (288,829), 97.25% speak Kham Dialect (2005 Yushu Statistical Yearbook)Gansu366,718Tibetan population in Tianzhou (Bare) (66,125), and 29.87% of them speak Amdo dialect (2000 census); Tibetans in Sunan county (about 8,393) speak both Amdo and U-Tsang DialectAbout 100,000 Tibetans live in India and other countries, and mostly speak U-Tsang dialect

Zipf's Law and Statistical Data on Modern Tibetan.

Zipf's Law in 50 Languages: Its Structural Pattern, Linguistic Interpretation, and Cognitive Motivation

Typological Features of Zhuang from the Perspective of Word Frequency Distribution.

Character Distributions of Classical Chinese Literary Texts: Zipf's Law, Genres, and Epochs

Scaling Laws in Human Language

A Diachronic Study of Chinese Word Length Distribution.

Word Length Distribution in Zhuang Language.

Quantifying Evolution of Short and Long-Range Correlations in Chinese Narrative Texts Across 2000 Years

Self-organizing Pattern in Multilayer Network for Words and Syllables

Qualitative Research on Frequency - Frequency Rank Distribution of Ancient Chinese Characters in Corpus

Chinese Evolution in Recent 150 Years: A Diachronic Study of Word Frequency in the Gospel of Mark

Character Usage in Chinese Short Message Service (SMS): a Real-World Study in Mainland China

Zipf'S Law Leads to Heaps' Law: Analyzing Their Relation in Finite-Size Systems

Beyond Zipf's law: Modeling the structure of human language

The Structural Complexity of Chinese Words and Its Relationship with Word Frequency.

Maximum Entropy, Word-Frequency, Chinese Characters, and Multiple Meanings

Large-Scale Analysis of Zipf’s Law in English Texts

A scaling law beyond Zipf's law and its relation to Heaps' law

A sociological analysis of Tibetan language policy issues in China

The 'Letter' Distribution in the Chinese Language

Compression and the origins of Zipf's law for word frequencies