Abstract:Background: In quantitative biology, mathematical models are used to describe and analyze biological processes. The parameters of these models are usually unknown and need to be estimated from experimental data using statistical methods. In particular, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have become increasingly popular as they allow for a rigorous analysis of parameter and prediction uncertainties without the need for assuming parameter identifiability or removing non-identifiable parameters. A broad spectrum of MCMC algorithms have been proposed, including single- and multi-chain approaches. However, selecting and tuning sampling algorithms suited for a given problem remains challenging and a comprehensive comparison of different methods is so far not available. Results: We present the results of a thorough benchmarking of state-of-the-art single- and multi-chain sampling methods, including Adaptive Metropolis, Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis, Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm, Parallel Tempering and Parallel Hierarchical Sampling. Different initialization and adaptation schemes are considered. To ensure a comprehensive and fair comparison, we consider problems with a range of features such as bifurcations, periodical orbits, multistability of steady-state solutions and chaotic regimes. These problem properties give rise to various posterior distributions including uni- and multi-modal distributions and non-normally distributed mode tails. For an objective comparison, we developed a pipeline for the semi-automatic comparison of sampling results. Conclusion: The comparison of MCMC algorithms, initialization and adaptation schemes revealed that overall multi-chain algorithms perform better than single-chain algorithms. In some cases this performance can be further increased by using a preceding multi-start local optimization scheme. These results can inform the selection of sampling methods and the benchmark collection can serve for the evaluation of new algorithms. Furthermore, our results confirm the need to address exploration quality of MCMC chains before applying the commonly used quality measure of effective sample size to prevent false analysis conclusions.

Bayesian Model Comparison Via Path-Sampling Sequential Monte Carlo.

Towards Automatic Model Comparison: An Adaptive Sequential Monte Carlo Approach

Monte Carlo algorithms for model assessment via conflicting summaries

Model Comparison in Approximate Bayesian Computation

Sequential Monte Carlo for cut-Bayesian posterior computation

Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selection

A comparison of Bayesian sampling algorithms for high-dimensional particle physics and cosmology applications

A Sequential Monte Carlo Algorithm to Incorporate Model Uncertainty in Bayesian Sequential Design

Bayesian model comparison with the Hyvärinen score: computation and consistency

Sequential Monte Carlo with Highly Informative Observations

When are Bayesian model probabilities overconfident?

Using deterministic approximations to accelerate SMC for posterior sampling

Stratified sampling and bootstrapping for approximate Bayesian computation

Meta-Uncertainty in Bayesian Model Comparison

A Bayesian Approach To Histogram Comparison

Bayesian Annealed Sequential Importance Sampling: An Unbiased Version of Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Bayesian Model Updating, Model Class Selection, and Model Averaging

A Conceptual Introduction to Bayesian Model Averaging

On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering

Comprehensive benchmarking of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for dynamical systems

Compatibility of Prior Specifications Across Linear Models