Understanding the provenance and quality of methods is essential for responsible reuse of FAIR data
Tracey L. Weissgerber,Małgorzata Anna Gazda,Gustav Nilsonne,Gerben ter Riet,Kelly D. Cobey,Julia Prieß-Buchheit,Jorge Noro,Robert Schulz,Joeri K. Tijdink,Evgeny Bobrov,Alexandra Bannach-Brown,Delwen L. Franzen,Ugo Moschini,Florian Naudet,Ulrich Mansmann,Maia Salholz-Hillel,Anita Bandrowski,Malcolm R. Macleod
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02879-x
IF: 82.9
2024-03-22
Nature Medicine
Abstract:Data availability and reusability are critical to open research. The FAIR principles provide a minimal set of guiding principles for making data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable 1 . Open data are not necessarily FAIR, and FAIR data are not necessarily open. Since their publication in 2016 1 , the FAIR principles have accelerated the open data movement by inspiring activities and infrastructure development 2,3,4 . The principles are also being adapted for other research outputs, such as software 5 . As funders increasingly demand FAIR practices and researchers work to implement the FAIR principles, additional actions should be taken for responsible data use and reuse. The FAIR principles indirectly outline the responsibilities of the data depositor by identifying dataset properties that facilitate reuse. However, the data provenance and the quality of the methods and procedures used to generate and validate data are often overlooked. This information is essential for responsible data reuse. FAIR data evaluations typically focus on the question: "Can I reuse these data?" We argue that it is time to also ask, "Should I re-use these data?" and "How should I reuse these data responsibly?". These questions allocate responsibilities between the data depositor and the prospective data user. This shift should include several elements.
biochemistry & molecular biology,cell biology,medicine, research & experimental