Abstract:Automated construction of reference model (ACRM) automatically constructs reference models by assigning weights to classes for various software projects using the metadata of all software versions and historical maintenance records. ACRM can aid developers in selecting appropriate software clustering techniques in a more structured and rigorous manner by leveraging generated reference models. The undocumented evolution of a software project and its underlying architecture underscores the need to recover the architecture from the software's implementation‐level artifacts. Despite the existence of various software remodularization techniques, they often suffer from inaccuracies, and evaluating their effectiveness is challenging due to the absence of accurate "ground‐truth" architectures or reference models. Prior studies on reference model construction are time‐consuming and labor‐intensive as it heavily relies on manual analysis by domain experts. Besides, other existing approaches that directly utilize the directory or package structure of the latest version can be unreliable, lacking in‐depth analysis of the employed software structure. To address the above limitations, in this paper, we propose Automated Construction of Reference Model (ACRM), an approach for automatically constructing reference models by assigning weights to classes for various software projects using the metadata of all software versions and historical maintenance records. We evaluate ACRM through both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The experiment results provide quantitative validation and show that the generated reference models are reasonable, as confirmed by the relationship between proposed reference models and architectural smells or bugs. Furthermore, we conduct a survey among the practitioners from industry, to gain insights from practitioners' practices and further validate the generated reference models. The survey shows that, on average, 87% of the participants agree with the reference models generated by ACRM. Moreover, we propose an improved metric, wc2c, which analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of different types of software clustering techniques using the proposed reference models of the given software. Finally, we discuss the potential benefits of using ACRM in analyzed projects, particularly in terms of improving software quality, reducing maintenance costs, and enhancing developer productivity.

Recovering Software Architectural Knowledge from Documentation Using Conceptual Model.

From Architectural Knowledge to Requirements Knowledge Management

Identifying and Recording Software Architectural Assumptions in Agile Development.

Managing Requirements Knowledge using Architectural Knowledge Management Approaches

Selecting a High-Quality Central Model for Sharing Architectural Knowledge.

Knowledge Architect: A Tool Suite for Managing Software Architecture Knowledge

Recover and RELAX: Concern-Oriented Software Architecture Recovery for Systems Development and Maintenance

Sharing architecture knowledge through models: Quality and cost

An Exploratory Study on Architectural Knowledge in Issue Tracking Systems

Refinement to Griffin Core Model and Model Mapping for Architectural Knowledge Sharing

Architectural Design Decision: Existing Models and Tools.

A Survey on Software Architectural Assumptions

Automated construction of reference model for software remodularization through software evolution

Querying Software Architecture Knowledge As Linked Open Data

A KDM-Based Approach for Architecture Conformance Checking in Adaptive Systems

Architecture Knowledge Representation and Communication Industry Survey

Recovery of Architectural Structure: A Case Study

An Industrial Case Study on an Architectural Assumption Documentation Framework

Toward Architectural Knowledge Sustainability. New Opportunities to Extend the Longevity of Systems

Software Architecture Recovery with Information Fusion