Abstract:Although the citations between scientific documents are deemed as a vehicle for dissemination, inheritance and development of scientific knowledge, not all citations are well-positioned to be equal. A plethora of taxonomies and machine-learning models have been implemented to tackle the task of citation function and importance classification from qualitative aspect. Inspired by the success of kernel functions from resulting general models to promote the performance of the support vector machine (SVM) model, this work exploits the potential of combining generative and discriminative models for the task of citation importance classification. In more detail, generative features are generated from a topic model, citation influence model (CIM) and then fed to two discriminative traditional machine-learning models, SVM and RF (random forest), and a deep learning model, convolutional neural network (CNN), with other 13 traditional features to identify important citations. The extensive experiments are performed on two data sets with different characteristics. These three models perform better on the data set from one discipline. It is very possible that the patterns for important citations may vary by the fields, which disable machine-learning models to learn effectively the discriminative patterns from publications from multiple domains. The RF classifier outperforms the SVM classifier, which accords with many prior studies. However, the CNN model does not achieve the desired performance due to small-scaled data set. Furthermore, our CIM model–based features improve further the performance for identifying important citations.

Are all literature citations equally important? Automatic citation strength estimation and its applications

Recovering uncaptured citations in a scholarly network: A two-step citation analysis to estimate publication importance

Recovering Missing Citations In A Scholarly Network A 2-Step Citation Analysis To Estimate Publication Importance

Survey of Visualization Methods on Academic Citation Information

Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal

The Role of Positive and Negative Citations in Scientific Evaluation

To Better Stand on the Shoulder of Giants.

A probe into 66 factors which are possibly associated with the number of citations an article received

The x-index: A new citation-distance-based index to measure academic influence

Measuring the influence of non-scientific features on citations

What's the use of citation? Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences

Important citations identification by exploiting generative model into discriminative model

Review on Citation Analysis Indicators for Evaluation Academic Influence

Citation count prediction: learning to estimate future citations for literature

The Impact of Internet Resources on Scholarly Communication: A Citation Analysis.

A Quantitative Exploration on Reasons for Citing Articles from the Perspective of Cited Authors

A bibliometric analysis of literature on bibliometrics in recent half-century

[Neutralizing Science Citation Index As an Academic Evaluation System].

Citation regression analysis of computer science publications in different ranking categories and subfields

How Important is Software to Library and Information Science Research? A Content Analysis of Full-Text Publications

A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar