Abstract:Numerous schemes have been proposed to incorporate a bulk forcing term into the lattice Boltzmann equation. In this paper we present a simple and straightforward comparative analysis of five popular schemes [Shan and Chen, Phys. Rev. E 47, 1815 (1993); Phys Rev Lett. 81, 1618 (1998); He et al., Phys. Rev. E 57, R13 (1998); Guo et al., Phys. Rev. E 65, 046308 (2002); Kupershtokh et al., Comput. Math. Appl. 58, 965 (2009)] in which their differences and similarities are identified. From the analysis we classify the schemes into two groups; the behaviors of the schemes in each group are proven to be identical up to second order. Numerical test simulating the two-dimensional unsteady Taylor-Green vortex flow problem demonstrate that all five schemes are of comparable accuracy for single-phase flow. However, for two-phase flow the situation is different, which is demonstrated by incorporating these schemes into different Shan-Chen-type multiphase models. The forcing scheme in the original Shan-Chen (SC) multiphase model turns out to be inaccurate in terms of the resulting surface tension for different density ratios and relaxation times. In the numerical tests, a typical equation of state and interparticle interactions including next-nearest neighbors were incorporated into the SC model. Our results confirm that the surface-tension values obtained from the original SC lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) simulation depend on the value of the relaxation time τ. For τ<0.7Δt, the surface tension agree well with the analytical solutions. However, when τ>0.7Δt, the surface tension turns out to be systematically larger than the analytical one, exceeding it by more than a factor of 2 for τ=2Δt. In contrast, with the application of the scheme proposed by He et al., the SC LBM produces very accurate surface tensions independent of the value of τ. We also found that the densities of the coexisting liquid and gas can be adjusted to match those at thermodynamic equilibrium if the particle interaction term includes next-nearest-neighbor contributions. The obtained results will be useful for further studies of two-phase flow with high density ratios using the SC LBM approach.

Force Method in a Pseudo-potential Lattice Boltzmann Model

Forcing Scheme In Pseudopotential Lattice Boltzmann Model For Multiphase Flows

Revisiting a class of modified pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann models for single-component multiphase flows

Surface Tension Adjustment in a Pseudo-Potential Lattice Boltzmann Model

Evaluation of force implementation in pseudopotential-based multiphase lattice Boltzmann models

On equations of state in pseudo-potential multiphase lattice Boltzmann model with large density ratio

Pseudo-potential Lattice Boltzmann Method with an Improved Forcing Scheme for the Cumulant Collision Model

Improved Stability Strategies for Pseudo-Potential Models of Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Multiphase Flow

Contact Angle Adjustment in Equation of States Based Pseudo-Potential Model

A Modified Pseudopotential Lattice Boltzmann Model with Improved Thermodynamic Consistency for Circular Interface

Lattice Boltzmann Modeling of Multiphase Flows at Large Density Ratio with an Improved Pseudopotential Model

Theoretical and numerical comparison between the pseudopotential and the free energy lattice Boltzmann methods

Study on Multicomponent Pseudo-Potential Model with Large Density Ratio and Heat Transfer

On a modified pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann model for multicomponent flows

Discrete Methods of the Energy Equations in the Pseudo-Potential Lattice Boltzmann Model Based Simulations

Contact Angle Adjustment in Equation-of-state-based Pseudopotential Model.

Fourth-order Analysis of Force Terms in Multiphase Pseudopotential Lattice Boltzmann Model

Forcing Term in Single-Phase and Shan-Chen-type Multiphase Lattice Boltzmann Models.

Schemes for Interpartical Interaction Forces in Multiphase Shan-Chen Model

Three-dimensional Pseudopotential Lattice Boltzmann Model for Multiphase Flows at High Density Ratio.

A critical review of the pseudopotential multiphase lattice Boltzmann model: Methods and applications