Abstract:Semi-supervised learning (SSL) that utilizes plenty of unlabeled examples to boost the performance of learning from limited labeled examples is a powerful learning paradigm with widely real-world applications such as information retrieval and document clustering. Label propagation (LP) is a popular SSL method which propagates labels through the dataset along high density areas defined by unlabeled examples, but it is fragile to bridge examples. Semi-supervised K-Means uses labeled examples to initialize clustering centers to separate different examples, however, semi-supervised K-Means fails in the situation of imbalanced issues, that is, the example size of each class varies significantly. This paper proposes a novel label propagated nonnegative matrix factorization method (LPNMF) to handle clean labeled but biased data and its extension LPNMF-E to handle noisy labeled data based on the framework of NMF. LPNMF decomposes the whole dataset into the product of a basis matrix and a coefficient matrix. To propagate labels to unlabeled examples, LPNMF regards the class indicators of labeled examples as their coefficients and iteratively updates both basis matrix and coefficients of unlabeled examples. LPNMF absorbs the merits from both semi-supervised K-Means and label propagation to handle their respective shortages. Specifically, on the one hand, LPNMF learns representative clustering centers based on the distribution of the dataset, similar to semi-supervised K-means, and thus is robust to the bridge examples. On the other hand, LPNMF pushes labels according to the affinity between examples, similar to label propagation, and thus relieves the biased problem. Moreover, we introduce a LPNMF extension to handle the noisy label case. LPNMF-E relaxes the constraint of labeled examples. Since the label of each labeled example also obtains label information from the global distribution of the whole dataset and local manifold of its neighbors, LPNMF-E outputs reliable class-indicators even if a portion of examples are incorrectly labeled. Theoretical analyses for the generalization ability of our proposed models are also provided. Experimental results on both clean and noisy labeled datasets confirm the effectiveness of LPNMF and LPNMF-E compared with both LP and the representative semi-supervised K-Means algorithms.

Improved Spectral Clustering via Embedded Label Propagation.

Parallel spectral clustering algorithm

Using Cluster Information to Improve Label Propagation

Spectral clustering with linear embedding: A discrete clustering method for large-scale data

Spectral Clustering With Adaptive Neighbors for Deep Learning

Semi-supervised clustering based on spectral clustering

Locally discriminative spectral clustering with composite manifold

Multi-label feature selection via spectral clustering-based label enhancement and manifold distribution consistency

Spectral Embedded Clustering: A Framework for In-Sample and Out-of-Sample Spectral Clustering

Spectral Embedded Clustering

Label Propagation Through Linear Neighborhoods

Label Propagated Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Clustering

A Convex Formulation for Spectral Shrunk Clustering

Clustering by Mining Density Distributions and Splitting Manifold Structure

Rank-Constrained Spectral Clustering with Flexible Embedding

Joint Learning of Latent Similarity and Local Embedding for Multi-View Clustering

A Label Propagation Approach Based on Local Optimization

Fast spectral clustering with self-adapted bipartite graph learning

Large Scale Spectral Clustering Via Landmark-Based Sparse Representation

Joint learning of fuzzy embedded clustering and non-negative spectral clustering

Label Enhancement Via Joint Implicit Representation Clustering.