Abstract:Three-way decision, an essential granular computing research tool, provides an efficient solution to complex and uncertain problems. Behavioral decision theory can analyze the risk preferences of decision-makers effectively. Scholars have conducted preliminary exploration on the fusion of these two theories, but it is still challenging to describe the different types of risk preferences of decision-makers. This paper combines prospect theory with regret theory and studies the compound risk preference modeling of three-way decision to address this issue. Because three attitudes of conflicts coincide with three-way decision, many scholars have conducted multi-dimensional research on three-way conflict analysis and accomplished remarkable results. However, few relevant studies consider psychological factors and risk attitudes of decision-makers, and it is more appropriate to describe agents' attitudes on issues using linguistic terms. This paper applies the proposed three-way decision model based on compounded risk preference and probabilistic linguistic term sets to the conflict analysis problem. We utilize examples to explain the decision-making process of the proposed model and three-way conflict analysis method with the influence of the compounded risk preference under the action of reference point and regret avoidance coefficient. The illustrative example illustrates that the proposed three-way decision model can effectively solve the software development conflict analysis problem for different decision-makers and the comparative analysis shows the advantages of the proposed model and method compared with the two existing methods. Finally, we verify the performance of the three-way decision model based on compounded risk preference by UCI data sets in parameter experiments. The changes of the reference point from 10 to 0 and regret avoidance coefficient in 0, 0.15 and 0.3 respectively demonstrate the trend rule of the model's thresholds and delay-decision rate index.

Three-way Decisions Based on Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets under Linguistic Assessment with the Aid of Group Decision Making.

Three-way Decisions Approach to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with Linguistic Information-Based Decision-Theoretic Rough Fuzzy Set

A Novel Three-Way Decision Based on Linguistic Evaluation

A three-way decision model associated with decision-theoretic rough fuzzy sets based on computing with words

Three-way group decision making with linguistic evaluations

A Multi-attribute Group Decision-making Approach Dealing with Linguistic Assessment Information

A three-way decisions approach based on double hierarchy linguistic aggregation operators of strict t-norms and t-conorms

Rough Set Approach to Group Decision Making Based on Linguistic Information Processing

Three-way decisions with evaluative linguistic expressions

On Three Perspectives for Deriving Three-Way Decision with Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information

Three-Way Group Decision Making Based on Evidential Reasoning with Probabilistic Linguistic Term Assessments.

Determining Three-Way Decisions With Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets Using a Relative Value Approach.

A Method to Solve Group Decision-Making Problem with Multi-granularity Linguistic Assessment Information

Three-way Decisions with Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets in Multiset-Valued Information Tables.

A Method Based on Rough Sets for Multi-attribute Group Decision-making with Incomplete Interval Linguistic Information

Three-way Group Decisions with Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets.

Multi-attribute group three-way decision making with degree-based linguistic term sets

Multiattribute Group Decision Making Method Using Extended Linguistic Variables.

A Novel Decision-Making Method Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Information

Three-way Decision for Probabilistic Linguistic Conflict Analysis Via Compounded Risk Preference

Multi-attribute Group Decision-Making under Probabilistic Uncertain Linguistic Environment.