Abstract:Objective: To explore the predictive effect of the renal tumor scoring system on the surgical outcomes of cystic renal masses (CRM). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 234 patients who received robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2018 to June 2020. And 31 cases had CRM and 203 cases had solid renal masses (SRM). The propensity score of patients was calculated by logistic regression model, and 1∶2 matching was performed by the nearest neighbor method. The changes in perioperative indexes and long-term estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in CRM group and SRM group were compared. The CRM group and SRM group were stratified according to the complexity grading of R.E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score, respectively, to compare the difference in the achievement rate of ideal surgical outcome between the two groups, and analyze the predictive factors affected. The CRM diameter was stratified with 4 cm as the cut-off value (CRM1 group with a diameter<4 cm, CRM2 group with a diameter≥4 cm), and the surgical results were compared with the matched SRM1 group and SRM2 group. Results: In the matching cohort, the CRM group comprised 29 patients with a mean age of (48.7±10.8) years, of which 22 (75.9%) were males. The SRM group included 58 patients with a mean age of (50.4±10.2) years, of which 41 (70.7%) were males, with no statistically significant difference (all P>0.05). The warm ischemia time (WIT) [M (Q1,Q3)] in the CRM group was longer than that in the SRM group [23(18, 25) vs 19(17, 25) min, P=0.040]. The operation time (OT) [M (Q1,Q3)] in the CRM group was also longer than that of the SRM group [130(100, 150) vs 108(86, 120) min, P=0.006]. The change in serum creatinine before and after the operation [M (Q1,Q3)] was higher in the CRM group than in the SRM group [15(10, 23) vs 12(6, 17) μmol/L, P=0.030]. The ideal surgical outcomes were achieved in 7 patients (24.1%) in the CRM group and 36 patients (62.1%) in the SRM group. The number of patients achieving ideal surgical outcomes in R.E.N.A.L. intermediate complex surgery and PADUA advanced complex surgery in the SRM group were 24 (58.5%) and 15 (51.7%), respectively, which were higher than those in the CRM group 6 (27.3%) and 1 (5.9%) respectively (P<0.05). Preoperative eGFR (OR=0.758, 95%CI: 0.719-0.799) and the nature of the tumor (CRM as reference, OR=4.883, 95%CI: 1.550-15.378) were influencing factors for achieving the ideal surgical outcome. Subgroup analysis showed that eGFR changes before and after surgery and the estimated blood loss (EBL) in the CRM2 group were higher than those in the SRM2 group, and WIT and OT were longer than those in the SRM2 group (all P<0.05). The EBL and WIT of the CRM1 group were shorter than those of the CRM2 group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The surgical risk of RAPN in complex CRMs with a maximum diameter of≥4 cm is higher than the risk of RAPN in SRM with equivalent R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA scores.

Use of the UCSF-CAPRA Score As a Predictor of Positive Surgical Margins after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

[A Rational Analysis of the Commonly Used Renal Tumor Scoring Systems in Predicting Surgical Outcomes of Cystic Renal Masses].

Development of risk-score model in patients with negative surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Risk classification system using the detailed positive surgical margin status for predicting biochemical recurrence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy

Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor

Development of a Prediction Model for Positive Surgical Margin in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Combined Analysis of CRMP4 Methylation Levels and CAPRA-S Score Predicts Metastasis and Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients

Addition of cribriform pattern 4 and intraductal prostatic carcinoma into the CAPRA-S tool improves post-radical prostatectomy patient stratification in a multi-institutional cohort

Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Modified Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for cases with anterior tumor: a propensity score-matched analysis

The correlation analysis of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Integration of Multiparameter MRI into Conventional Pretreatment Risk Factors to Predict Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy.

Predictors of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: single-centre analysis

Analysis of the correlation between preoperative factors and positive surgical margin after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Functional Preservation and Oncologic Control Following Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Analysis of factors associated with positive surgical margins and the five-year survival rate after prostate cancer resection and predictive modeling

Risk Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus

Construction for the Predictive Model of Quality of Life in Patients after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Cohort Study.

The value of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and red blood cell distribution width in predicting positive surgical margin after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Propensity-score-matched comparison of soft tissue surgical margins status between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy