Abstract:Background: There is little evidence regarding the optimal surgical sequence for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) patients undergoing colorectal resection with simultaneous liver metastasis resection. Methods: CRLM patients from five centers were retrospectively evaluated. The short-term outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Postoperative complications were measured according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Grade I to II complications were defined as minor postoperative complications. The long-term outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to overcome the selection bias between colorectal resection first and liver resection first. Results: A total of 1255 CRLM patients were included. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, a body mass index (BMI) < 24 kg/m2, primary site in the left hemicolon, non-bilobar distribution of liver metastases and no preoperative chemotherapy were significantly associated with the likelihood of colorectal resection first. After 1:1 PSM, there was no significant difference between the colorectal resection first group and the liver resection first group. Compared with patients with colorectal resection first, patients with liver resection first had a comparable postoperative infection rate (15.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.735), a longer operation time (305.0 [231.3-416.0] vs. 300.0 [225.0-374.0], P = 0.033), more intraoperative blood loss (200.0 [150.0-400.0] vs. 100.0 [100.0-300.0], P < 0.001), a higher postoperative minor complication rate (28.7% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.023) and a higher postoperative ICU rate (14.7% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.022). IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients who underwent colorectal resection first had a similar PFS (P = 0.702, median: 20.6 months vs. 16.6 months) and unfavourable OS (P = 0.014, median: 48.5 months vs. 67.0 months) compared with patients who underwent liver resection first. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, colorectal resection first was an unfavourable risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.301, 95% CI 1.048-1.616, P = 0.017) and was not an independent predictor for PFS (HR = 0.986, 95% CI 0.831-1.170, P = 0.874). IPTWadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, including postoperative complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative chemotherapy, produced consistent results. Conclusion: Although violating the "sterility principle", patients who underwent colorectal resection first did not have an increased postoperative infection rate and had some better short-term outcomes and comparable PFS than those who underwent liver resection first.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Colorectal Resections for Patients Undergoing Simultaneous R0 Resection for Liver Metastases: a Propensity Score Analysis

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis].

Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Outcomes Compared with Conventional Open Surgery.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastasis with Minimally Invasive or Open Surgery

Optimal Surgical Sequence for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Patients Receiving Colorectal Cancer Resection with Simultaneous Liver Metastasis Resection: A Multicentre Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study.

The Value of Laparoscopic Simultaneous Colorectal and Hepatic Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Primary Tumor and Liver Metastasis after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Comparison Between Simultaneous Resection and Staged Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis: a Meta-analysis

Mini-invasive vs open resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: A meta-analysis

[Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Resection of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis].

Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Reevaluation of laparoscopic surgery's value in pathological T4 colon cancer with comparison to open surgery: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Case-Matched Studies

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score matched and coarsened exact matched study

Timing of Hepatectomy for Resectable Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: for Whom Simultaneous Resection is More Suitable - A Meta-Analysis

Propensity-score matched outcomes of resection of stage IV primary colon cancer with and without simultaneous resection of liver metastases

Simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases:incisions and short-term outcomes

Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Lateral Segmentectomy for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Impact of Postoperative Infectious Complications on Long-Term Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Resection for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Simultaneous vs. staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a metaanalysis