Subunit Determination of the Conductance of Hair-Cell Mechanotransducer Channels.

Maryline Beurg,Wei Xiong,Bo Zhao,Ulrich Müller,Robert Fettiplace
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420906112
2014-01-01
Abstract:Significance Cochlear hair cells are sensory receptors of the inner ear that detect sound via opening of mechanically sensitive transduction channels at the tips of the eponymous hairs. The conductance of the channel increases two-fold along the cochlea, but neither its molecular structure nor mechanism of tonotopic variation is known. We show that when either of two deafness-linked proteins, transmembrane channel-like protein isoform 1 (TMC1) and tetraspan membrane protein of hair cell stereocilia (TMHS, also known as lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 5, LHFPL5) is knocked out, the conductance variation is lost. Furthermore, the effect of LHFPL5 is attributable to down-regulation of TMC1, suggesting that titrating the TMC1 content of the channel modulates its conductance. Evidence indicates that both proteins interact with the mechanotransduction channel and also with protocadherin-15, a component of the extracellular tip link that applies force to the channel. Cochlear hair cells convert sound stimuli into electrical signals by gating of mechanically sensitive ion channels in their stereociliary (hair) bundle. The molecular identity of this ion channel is still unclear, but its properties are modulated by accessory proteins. Two such proteins are transmembrane channel-like protein isoform 1 (TMC1) and tetraspan membrane protein of hair cell stereocilia (TMHS, also known as lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 5, LHFPL5), both thought to be integral components of the mechanotransduction machinery. Here we show that, in mice harboring an Lhfpl5 null mutation, the unitary conductance of outer hair cell mechanotransducer (MT) channels was reduced relative to wild type, and the tonotopic gradient in conductance, where channels from the cochlear base are nearly twice as conducting as those at the apex, was almost absent. The macroscopic MT current in these mutants was attenuated and the tonotopic gradient in amplitude was also lost, although the current was not completely extinguished. The consequences of Lhfpl5 mutation mirror those due to Tmc1 mutation, suggesting a part of the MT-channel conferring a large and tonotopically variable conductance is similarly disrupted in the absence of Lhfpl5 or Tmc1. Immunolabelling demonstrated TMC1 throughout the stereociliary bundles in wild type but not in Lhfpl5 mutants, implying the channel effect of Lhfpl5 mutations stems from down-regulation of TMC1. Both LHFPL5 and TMC1 were shown to interact with protocadherin-15, a component of the tip link, which applies force to the MT channel. We propose that titration of the TMC1 content of the MT channel sets the gradient in unitary conductance along the cochlea.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?