Successful Diagnosis of Intrahepatic Splenosis Mimicking Hepatic Tumor
Zhi He,Xiao Xu,Qinghong Ke,Shusen Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2016.01.001
2016-01-01
Abstract:Dear Editor, Intrahepatic splenosis (IHS) is the autotransplantation of splenic tissue that mostly develops after abdominal injury, and is often misdiagnosed as hepatic tumor because of similarities in radiological features. Surgical intervention has been reported to be unnecessarily performed to arrive at a correct diagnosis [1], [2]. A 51-year-old man had undergone an emergency splenectomy following a traffic accident 20 years ago. The patient had only surgical scar on the skin without any other symptoms in the physical examination. An abdominal ultrasonogram presented two lesions: a 21-mm homogeneous cystic mass in the left lobe of the liver and a 33 mm × 26-mm lesion in the right lobe of the liver (Figure 1A), which had marked enhancement at arterial phase and delay scan by dynamic contrast computed tomography (CT; Figure 1B). Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed and the lesions displayed low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, with lower enhancement after administration of contrast agent compared with the normal liver parenchyma (Figure 1C). Finally, after a percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy using an 18 G cutting needle, histological examination of hepatic tissue exhibited abnormal architecture with splenosis (Figure 1D). (A) Ultrasonography of the left and right liver mass: a 21-mm homogeneous cystic mass in the left lobe of the liver and a 33 mm × 26-mm lesion in the right lobe of the liver. (B) Dynamic contrast computed tomography scan (arterial phase): marked enhancement at arterial phase and delay scan and the attenuation was similar to the aorta. (C) Magnetic resonance imaging: the lesions demonstrated low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, with lower enhancement after administration of contrast agent compared with the normal liver parenchyma. (D) Histological examination of hepatic tissue exhibited abnormal architecture with splenosis. Splenosis can occur after splenic rupture by trauma or surgery, with incidence rates reported up to 44–76%. The most frequent sites of implanted splenic tissue spread after trauma are the abdominal or pelvic cavity. Although splenosis has been observed on the surface of the small and large intestines, the greater omentum, parietal peritoneum, mesentery, the undersurface of the diaphragm, and the thorax of patients, splenosis inside the liver is rare; it was first reported by D'Angelica et al [3] in 1998. Our patient was diagnosed with metastatic hepatic carcinoma (HCC) before the biopsy. It is important to distinguish splenosis from accessory spleen. Splenosis as the autotransplantation of splenic tissue with normal splenic function is a benign disease that is different from accessory spleen. Accessory spleens are congenital and arise from the dorsal mesogastrium during the embryonic period [4]. They have normal splenic histology with blood supply from the splenic artery, and are located near the splenopancreatic or gastrosplenic ligament. However, splenosis tissues have distorted architecture with no hilum, poorly formed capsules, and variable shape and size [4]. Because most patients with splenosis are asymptomatic, ectopic splenic tissue is found incidentally during ultrasonography (US), CT, or MRI examinations. When imaging features of a lesion in a patient with splenic trauma or splenectomy are compatible with normal splenic tissue, the diagnosis of splenosis should be considered. US findings are those of a well-demarcated, hypoechoic to isoechoic mass with nonspecific arterial and venous color Doppler signals. On noncontrast CT scan, the mass is hypodense, and after contrast administration it is hyperdense in the arterial phase, isodense in the portal phase, and hypodense in the equilibrium phase. The lesions were mainly hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. After administration of small iron oxide particles, the lesions remained slightly hyperintense relative to the hypointense liver parenchyma but showed a 50% loss in signal intensity [5]. Our case had the same ultrasound features; however, the CT and MRI features were different. In our view, pathological diagnosis as the golden standard is vital, especially when intrahepatic splenosis is suspected; therefore biopsy is necessary. This work was supported by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET) and Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents.