Abstract:Speculative execution attacks exploiting speculative execution to leak secrets have aroused significant concerns in both industry and academia. They mainly exploit covert or side channels over microarchitectural states left by mis-speculated and squashed instructions (i.e., transient instructions). Most such attacks target cache states. Existing cache-based defenses against speculative execution attacks fall into two categories, Invisible and Undo. Most Invisible defenses buffer execution metadata of speculative instructions and place them into the cache only if the speculatively executed instructions become determined. Motivated by the fact that mis-speculations are rare cases, Undo defenses allow speculative instructions to modify cache states. Upon a mis-speculation, they rollback cache states to the ones prior to the execution of transient instructions. However, Invisible defenses have been recently found insecure by the speculative interference attack. This calls for a deep security inspection of Undo defenses against speculative execution attacks. In this paper, we present unXpec as the first attack against Undo-based safe speculation. It exploits the secret-dependent timing channel exhibited through the rollback operations of Undo defenses. Specifically, the rollback process requires both invalidating cache lines brought into the cache by transient instructions and restoring evicted cache lines from the cache by transiently loaded data. This opens up a channel that encodes secret via the timing difference between when rollback involves much invalidation and restoration or not. We further leverage eviction sets to enforce more restoration operations. This yields a longer rollback time and thus a larger secret-dependent timing difference. We demonstrate the timing channel over the open-source CleanupSpec, a representative Undo solution. A single transient load can trigger a secret-dependent timing difference of 22 cycles (without eviction sets) of 32 cycles (with eviction sets), which is sufficiently exploitable for constructing a covert channel for speculative execution attacks. We run unXpec on the gem5 simulator with CleanupSpec enabled. The results show that unXpec can leak secrets at a high rate of 140 Kbps with an accuracy over 90%. Simply enforcing constant-time rollback to mitigate unXpec may induce an over 70% performance overhead.

A Speculative Mechanism for Barrier Synchronization

Improving MapReduce Performance with Partial Speculative Execution

Barrier-Aware Warp Scheduling for Throughput Processors.

Balancing Thread Partition for Efficiently Exploiting Speculative Thread-Level Parallelism

A cost estimation based speculative path determination method for speculative thread partitioning

A Cost Estimation Model for Speculative Thread Partitioning

Dynamically Spawning Speculative Threads to Improve Speculative Path Execution.

A Feasibility Study on Hyperblock-based Aggressive Speculative Execution Model

SpecBox: A Label-Based Transparent Speculation Scheme Against Transient Execution Attacks

Using heuristic value prediction and dynamic task granularity resizing to improve software speculation.

Exploiting Security Dependence for Conditional Speculation Against Spectre Attacks

unXpec: Breaking Undo-based Safe Speculation

A Dynamically Adaptive Approach for Speculative Loop Execution in SMT Architectures

Speculative Parallelization Using State Separation and Multiple Value Prediction.

Mitigating Speculation-based Attacks through Configurable Hardware/Software Co-design

Quantitative Analysis of Inter-block Dependence in Speculative Execution

Mis-speculation-Driven Compiler Framework for Aggressive Loop Automatic Parallelization

TAB barrier: Hybrid barrier synchronization for NoC-based processors

HEUSPEC: A Software Speculation Parallel Model

Enhanced Speculative Parallelization Via Incremental Recovery

A thread partitioning approach for speculative multithreading