Polygenic Risk for Type 2 Diabetes in African Americans

Marguerite R Irvin,Tian Ge,Amit Patki,Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra,Nicole D Armstrong,Brittney Davis,Alana C Jones,Emma Perez,Lauren Stalbow,Matthew Lebo,Eimear Kenny,Ruth J F Loos,Maggie C Y Ng,Jordan W Smoller,James B Meigs,Leslie A Lange,Elizabeth W Karlson,Nita A Limdi,Hemant K Tiwari,Marguerite R. Irvin,Nicole D. Armstrong,Ruth J.F. Loos,Maggie C. Y. Ng,Jordan W. Smoller,James B. Meigs,Leslie A. Lange,Elizabeth W. Karlson,Nita A. Limdi,Hemant K. Tiwari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/db23-0232
IF: 7.7
2024-03-13
Diabetes
Abstract:African Americans (AAs) have been underrepresented in polygenic risk score (PRS) studies. Herein, we integrated genome-wide data from multiple observational studies on type 2 diabetes (T2D), encompassing a total of 101,987 AAs, to train and optimize an AA focused T2D PRS (PRS AA ), using a Bayesian polygenic modeling method (PRS-CS). We further tested the score in three independent studies with a total of 7,275 AAs. We then compared the PRS AA to other published scores. Results show that a 1 standard deviation increase in the PRS AA was associated with 40%-60% increase in the odds of T2D (OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.37-1.88; OR=1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.70; and OR=1.45, 95% CI 1.30-1.62) across three testing cohorts. These models captured 1.0%-2.6% of the variance (R 2 ) in T2D on the liability scale. The positive predictive values (PPV) for three calculated score thresholds (the top 2%, 5% 10%) ranged from 14% to 35%. The PRS AA , in general, performed similarly to existing T2D PRS. Larger datasets remain needed to continue to evaluate the utility of within-ancestry scores in the AA population.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?