Abstract:Abstract Introduction Chest pain accounts for 8.8% of all presentations to an Hospital Emergency Department. In line with ESC guidelines (2019), an adapted HEART pathway, utilising CT Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) is delivered by our Emergency Cardiology Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANP) and Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS) as part of an ambulatory chest pain pathway. It is our first line diagnostic test for patients with a non-ischaemic 12-lead ECG and normal cardiac biomarkers, with a low-to-intermediate HEART score. Responsibility for the referral of patients onto the pathway is shared with the Cardiology Registrars. This is a collaborative interdisciplinary pathway between Emergency Medicine, Cardiology, and Radiology. Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CTCA as part of an Accelerated Diagnostic Pathway (ADP), for evaluation of chest pain of possible cardiac origin in low-to-intermediate risk chest pain patients. Methods We examined the CTCA and safety outcomes of patients presenting between Jan 1st 2022 – Dec 31st 2023 who were risk stratified as low-to-intermediate risk for coronary artery disease, based on Heart score, 12-lead ECG and biomarker testing, using the electronic patient records. Institutional ethics was in place. Results Between January 1st and December 31st 2022, 290 patients were referred for CTCA, with a total of 268 CTCAs completed. The number of patients referred on the ADP increased by 53.4% in 2023 with 445 being referred for CTCA, 416 of which have been completed, with 12 pending completion. 38% of patients were found to have evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary artery disease causing at least 50% stenosis was identified in 11% of patients. 4.5% of these patients required revascularisation, 17 of whom underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with a further 13 being referred for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. A positive family history was the most dominant risk factor associated with significant CAD. An equivalent number of males to females were referred for CTCA, however, men were more than 7 times more likely to have severe disease. (12% vs 88%). All patients referred for CTCA via the chest pain pathway were followed up by the Emergency Cardiology ANP/CNS in a virtual clinic, delivering risk factor modification advice and preventative therapies, when indicated. There was no evidence of any major adverse cardiovascular events within a 30-day period for this patient cohort. Conclusion The integration of CTCA into an adapted HEART pathway has resulted a safe and timely discharge for patients presenting to ED with acute chest pain, of possible cardiac origin. CTCA offers excellent early detection of coronary artery disease in this patient cohort with normal ECGs and cardiac biomarkers, but with a history of chest pain suggestive of CAD.

Effect of a heart score best practice alert on discharge decisions and outcomes of patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain

Safety and Effectiveness of the High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin HEART Pathway in Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

Comparison of usual care and the HEART score for effectively and safely discharging patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department: would the score always help?

Role of HEART score in prediction of coronary artery disease and major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with chest pain

Improvement of Emergency Department Chest Pain Evaluation Using Hs-cTnT and a Risk Stratification Pathway

Diagnostic accuracy of the HEART Pathway and EDACS-ADP when combined with a 0-hour/1-hour hs-cTnT protocol for assessment of acute chest pain patients

Frequency, compliance, and yield of cardiac testing after high-sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol implementation

Safety and efficiency of implementation of high-sensitivity troponin T in the assessment of emergency department patients with cardiac chest pain

HEART Score: Prospective Evaluation of Its Accuracy and Applicability

Safety and efficiency of modified HEART scores without troponin or electrocardiography: an analysis based on two European out-of-hours primary care cohorts

Impact of coronary risk scores on disposition decision in emergency patients with chest pain

Evaluating the performance of the HEART score in a Tanzanian emergency department

HEART vs EDACS Scores on Predicting Major Events Among Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome at the Cardiac Emergency Department

External Validation of the Recalibrated HEART Score for Evaluation of Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

Evaluating Sex Disparities in the Emergency Department Management of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome

Improving Risk Stratification in Patients with Chest Pain: the Erlanger HEARTS3 Score

Evaluating the integration of CTCA as part of an accelerated diagnostic pathway for patients presenting to the Emergency Department with acute chest pain: a two-year review

External validation of the preHEART score and comparison with current clinical risk scores for prehospital risk assessment in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS

Comparison of heart, grace and TIMI scores to predict major adverse cardiac events from chest pain in a Spanish health care region

[The importance of clinical risk assessment in reducing the pathway of acute coronary syndrome]

Implementation of an Early Discharge Protocol and Chest Pain Clinic for Low-Risk Chest Pain in the Emergency Department