Differential Effects in GABA Receptor Regulation Between Sexes and its Role in Cocaine Use Disorder

Brooke Christensen,Abigail L. Carr,Addison R. Van Namen,Erin Calipari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.540.998800
2024-05-15
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Abstract:ID 99880 Poster Board 540 Aim: Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is characterized by cocaine-induced alterations in dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). Critically, sex differences in dopamine release both in basal and drug-induced processes play a causal role in sex-specific behaviors associated with CUD – where females show enhanced vulnerability. While work has focused on sex differences in the anatomy of dopamine neurons and relative dopamine levels, an important characteristic of dopamine release from axon terminals is that it is rapidly modulated by local regulatory mechanisms independent of somatic activity. GABA released from local microcircuitry in the NAc has been shown to play a critical role in regulating dopamine release at the terminals through ionotropic GABA-A and G i -coupled GABA-B receptors and has also been implicated in cocaine-induced processes. Here we define basal sex differences in dopamine release regulation via GABA in the NAc and show how this is dysregulated by chronic cocaine exposure. Methods: To dissociate dopamine terminal regulation from somatic regulation, we utilize ex vivo fast scan cyclic voltammetry and optogenetics in striatal brain slices. Dopamine release was evoked from terminals via electrical or optogenetic stimulation, and GABA receptor modulation of this signal was determined via bath application of picrotoxin (GABA-A antagonist), muscimol (GABA-A agonist), saclofen (GABA-B antagonist), and baclofen (GABA-B agonist) to slices. This was done in the absence and presence of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist DHßE to determine if GABA receptor modulation was through cholinergic interneurons. Results: GABA-A and GABA-B receptor agonists decreased dopamine release in the striatum similarly in males and females. However, sex differences were observed in antagonizing GABA receptors following both electrical and optogenetic stimulation. Picrotoxin, GABA-A antagonist, increased dopamine release to a greater extent in females compared to males, and this effect remained in the presence of DHßE. GABA-B antagonist saclofen increased dopamine release to a greater extent in males compared to females, however, this sex difference was only in the absence of DHßE. Lastly, GABA mediated inhibition of dopamine release was blunted following cocaine exposure in both males and females. Conclusion: These data highlight differential effects in GABA receptor regulation of dopamine release between sexes. First, there is enhanced GABA-B-mediated inhibition in males that is modulated through cholinergic interneurons. Secondly, GABA-A mediated inhibition was enhanced in females, and this effect was independent of nicotinic receptor activation, suggesting this mechanism is directly at the dopamine terminals. Finally, these mechanisms undergo cocaine-induced plasticity in both males and females. The results of these studies will contribute to the understanding of how sex fits into the comprehensive framework for dopamine release regulation and how dysregulation of these processes influences the trajectory of CUD in both sexes.
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?