Rapid Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy with Coformulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Efavirenz, Lamivudine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-positive Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: Week 48 Results of the Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

Ran Wang,Lijun Sun,Xi Wang,Yuanyi Zhai,Lijing Wang,Ping Ma,Cuisong Wu,Yingquan Zhou,Renfang Chen,Rugang Wang,Fengchi Zhang,Wei Hua,Aixin Li,Wei Xia,Yue Gao,Rui Li,Shiyun Lv,Ying Shao,Yu Cao,Tong Zhang,Hao Wu,Chao Cai,Lili Dai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae012
IF: 20.999
2024-01-20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Most international treatment guidelines recommend rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for people newly diagnosed with HIV-1 infection, but experiences with rapid ART initiation remain limited in China. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efavirenz (400-mg) plus lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV + 3TC + TDF) versus coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) in rapid ART initiation among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). This multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial enrolled MSM aged ≥18 years to start ART within 14 days of confirmed HIV diagnosis. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive EFV(400-mg) + 3TC + TDF or BIC/FTC/TAF. The primary end point was viral suppression (<50 copies/ml) at 48 weeks per FDA Snapshot analysis. Between March 2021 and July 2022, 300 participants were enrolled; 154 were assigned to receive EFV + 3TC + TDF (EFV group) and 146 BIC/FTC/TAF (BIC group). At week 48, 118 (79.2%) and 140 (95.9%) participants in the EFV and BIC group, respectively, were retained in care with viral suppression; and 24 (16.1%) and 1 (0.7%) participant in the EFV and BIC group (p < 0.001), respectively, discontinued treatment due to adverse effects, death, or loss to follow-up. The median increase of CD4 count was 181 and 223 cells/μL (p = 0.020), respectively, for the EFV and BIC group, at week 48. The overall incidence of adverse effects was significantly higher for the EFV group (65.8% vs 37.7%, P < 0.001). BIC/FTC/TAF was more efficacious and safer than EFV(400-mg) + 3TC + TDF for rapid ART initiation among HIV-positive MSM in China.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?