New cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with advanced cancer – A prospective study comparing MR‐proADM, MR‐proANP, copeptin, high‐sensitivity troponin T and NT‐proBNP
Markus S. Anker,Laura C. Lück,Muhammad Shahzeb Khan,Jan Porthun,Sara Hadzibegovic,Alessia Lena,Ursula Wilkenshoff,Pia Weinländer,Ruben Evertz,Matthias Totzeck,Amir A. Mahabadi,Tienush Rassaf,Stefan D. Anker,Lars Bullinger,Ulrich Keller,Mahir Karakas,Ulf Landmesser,Javed Butler,Stephan von Haehling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3497
2024-11-28
European Journal of Heart Failure
Abstract:(A) Univariable receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for all biomarkers. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves for best cut‐point of mid‐regional pro‐adrenomedullin (MR‐proADM) for survival (n = 442). AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; hsTnT, high‐sensitivity troponin T; MR‐proANP, mid‐regional pro‐atrial natriuretic peptide; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide. Aims Traditional cardiovascular (CV) biomarkers (high‐sensitivity troponinT [hsTnT] and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide [NT‐proBNP]) are important to monitor cancer patients' cardiac function and to assess prognosis. Newer CV biomarkers (mid‐regional pro‐adrenomedullin [MR‐proADM], C‐terminal pro‐arginine vasopressin [copeptin], and mid‐regional pro‐atrial natriuretic peptide [MR‐proANP]) might outperform traditional biomarkers. Methods and results Overall, 442 hospitalized cancer patients without significant CV disease or current infection were enrolled (61 ± 15 years, 52% male, advanced cancer stage: 85%) and concentrations of CV biomarkers were analysed. Differences in echocardiographic, clinical, laboratory parameters were assessed. Patients were followed for up to 69 months for all‐cause mortality. In univariable analyses, MR‐proADM, hsTnT, copeptin, MR‐proANP, and NT‐proBNP predicted all‐cause mortality. In multivariable analyses (adjusted for sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], C‐reactive protein, anti‐cancer therapy, reason for hospitalization, cancer stage and type), only MR‐proADM remained an independent predictor of mortality (MR‐proADM per 1 ln: hazard ratio [HR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47–3.50], p 0.94 nmol/L were older, more often had cancer stage IV, showed reduced performance status, eGFR, haemoglobin, diastolic left ventricular function, and elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Conclusion MR‐proADM is an independent predictor of mortality in advanced stage, hospitalized cancer patients without significant CV disease or current infection. The optimal MR‐proADM cut‐point for mortality prediction was 0.94 nmol/L with hazards for mortality being approximately 2.5 times higher. There was a continuous increase in mortality risk with stepwise increase of MR‐proADM concentrations. Elevated concentrations of MR‐proADM were also associated with reduced performance status and mildly reduced left ventricular diastolic function as well as higher age and more often cancer stage IV.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems