Comparison of Clinical Effects of Different Kinds of Down-Regulation Protocols by Short-Acting Triptorelin in IVF/ICSI

Wen ZHANG,Aibin LI,Wenyu XI,Lei LI,Wei HUANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14188/j.1671-8852.2011.05.020
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the clinical effects of different kinds of down-regulation protocol by short-acting Triptorelin in IVF/ICSI. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 279 cycles. According to the frequency of injection 0.1 mg Triptorelin, patients were divided into Group A (every other day) and Group B(every day). On the day of D3(the 3rd day of menstrual cycle), Group A were sub-divided into two groups according to whether achieved the pituitary down regulation criterion as Group A 1 (achieved group) and Group A 2 (failed group), and the usage of short-acting Triptorelin in Group A 2 was changed to 0.1 mg/d. The gonadotropin (Gn) in group A was administrated when the pituitary down regulation criterion has been achieved, while in group B it was administrated after 0.1 mg Triptorelinla has been injected for 14 days. Results: There were significant differences among the three groups in the mean amount of triptorelin and the days to pituitary down regulation (P<0.01). The total days of Gn in group A 1 were longer than in group A 2 and group B (both P<0.05). The number of occytes collected in group A 1 was more than in group B (P<0.05). Among the three groups, there were no statistical differences in the dosage of Gn, the number of embryo transfer, the plantation rate and the clinic pregnancy rate. Conclusion: While the three protocols have the same clinical effect, Group A is the most economical one.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?