Clinical differential diagnosis of male interstitial cystitis with ⅢB chronic prostatitis: a report of 18 cases

Ye Ning,Jianwei Lv,Zheng Li,Jing Leng,Juanjie Bo,Dongming Liu,Yiran Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0848.2011.03.008
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To summarize the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis and explore the differential diagnosis with chronic prostatitis. Methods Clinical data of 18 patients with IC from April 2009 to May 2010 who suffered from suprapubic pain urinary frequency and urgency were retrospectively analyzed. All these patients were misdiagnosed as category III chronic prostatitis. According to the NIDDK diagnostic criteria of IC, O' Leary -Sant scoring, PCT, cystoscopy under anaesthesia were used to confirm the diagnosis of IC. 24h urinary diary, routine uronoscopy, prostate fluid routine and bacterial culture examination were taken before the treatment of hydrodistention and Intravesical Instillation of heparin. Results For these 18 male IC patients, the positive rate of PST was 77.8% (14/18), and the positive rate of the cystoscopy under anaesthesia was 94.4%(17/18). During following up (average 8.9±4.1 month), the patients' symptoms were improved distinctly. The O' Leary-Sant scoring and questionnaire scoring were (13.52±4.33) and (8.59±2.35) before treatment, (6.12±3.09) and (4.65±3.40) after treatment respectively. The 24 hours' frequency and amount of urination were changed from (11.5±3.9) times and (159.5±30.8) ml before treatment to (7.5±4.3) times and (241.7±45.3) ml after treatment (P<0.01). Conclusion The male patients with IC and patients with chronic prostatitis had similar clinical symptoms. IC diagnosis can be confirmed from chronic prostatitis by the O' Leary-Sant scoring, PST, and the cystoscopy under anaesthesia. Hydrodistention combining with intravesical instillation of heparin can evidently improve the symptoms of the male IC patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?