Abstract:Background: To evaluate the prognostic value of the proposed 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients without cervical lymph node metastasis in comparison with the AJCC/ UICC 7th edition. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 382 newly diagnosed non-metastatic NPC patients without cervical Lymph node metastasis who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). All received elective neck irradiation to levels II, III, VA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to evaluate the prognostic values between adjacent stage categories of the AJCC/ UICC 7th edition and the proposed 8th edition, including overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and disease–free survival (DFS). The Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell’s concordance index (c-index) were applied to compare the two prognostic systems with different numbers of stages. Results: The median follow-up time was 61.1 months, with a range from 1 months to 91 months. The 5-year OS, LRFS, RFFS, DMFS and DFS were 86.9%, 96.7%, 99.1%, 93.3% and 82.6%, respectively. For LRFS and DMFS, the proposed eighth editions had superior prognostic value to the AJCC/ UICC 7th edition (P = 0.032 vs. P = 0.086 and P = 0.013 vs. P = 0.112). The 5-year OS and DFS were found to be significant both by the seventh and the proposed 8th editions. The difference between T1 and T3, T1 and T4, T2 and T3 and T2 and T4 by the proposed eighth edition were found to be significant (P = 0.042, P = 0.041, P = 0.000, and P = 0.000), however, there was no significant difference between T1 and T3, T2 and T3 by the seventh edition (P = 0.204, and P = 0.215). In addition, the difference between T1, T2, T3 with T4 were found to be significant in DFS (P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0.037) and there was no significant difference between T1 and T3 (P = 0.162) by the seventh edition and there was significantly different between T2 and T4 (P = 0.026) by the proposed 8th editions. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, T stage of the proposed 8th editions and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS, LRFS, DMFS and DFS. The AIC value was smaller for the 8th edition compared to the 7th edition staging system. The C-index value was larger for the 8th edition compared to the 7th edition staging system. Conclusions: IMRT with elective neck irradiation provides excellent local-regional control for NPC patients without cervical lymph node metastasis. The proposed eighth editions had superior prognostic value to the AJCC/ UICC 7th edition for LRFS and DMFS and lead a better distinction between adjacent T stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients for OS and DFS. Overall, the proposed 8th UICC T classification seems to be superior to the 7th UICC T classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients without cervical lymph node metastasis. Legal entity responsible for the study: Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

Investigation of Clinical Evaluation of the Chinese 2008, UICC 2002, and UICC 2009 Staging System in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

The Comparative Analysis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma among Chinese 1992, 2008 and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 2010 Staging Systems

[New Clinical Staging System for Carcinoma of Nasal Cavity].

A Comparison Between the Chinese 2008 and the 7th Edition AJCC Staging Systems for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Comparison of the Chinese 2008 and the 7th Edition Ajcc Staging Systems for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Comparative study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system between the chinese 2008 and'92 Fuzhou

The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions

Research Progress in the International Union Against Cancer (UICC)/American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System and the Chinese 1992 Staging System of Nasopharygeal Carcinoma

Evolution Of The Chinese Staging System For Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Comparing the 7th and 8th editions of UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the IMRT era

Validation and Suggestion of Eighth T Classifications of the UICC/AJCC Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: a Retrospective Analysis

Advances on clinical stage of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

A comparison of three different staging systems of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Proposal for the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Staging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on the 8th Edition of the AJCC/UICC Staging System

Comparison Between the 7th and the Proposed 8th Editions of the UICC Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Without Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis

Staging of T2 and T3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Proposed modifications for improving the current AJCC staging system

[Application of the 2007 Lung Cancer Staging System by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer].

The Chinese Classification System Compared with TNM Staging in Prognosis of Patients with Primary Hepatic Carcinoma after Resection.