Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer

Fan-lu MENG,Jin-hui TIAN,Li MA
2011-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and adverse of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Journal Full Text Database were searched and references of the included studies up to April 2010. Randomized controlled trials involving neoadjvant chemotherapy plus surgery and surgery alone for esophageal cancer. Study selection, data collection and quality assessment of studies were performed by two individual reviewers according to the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.0.2. Statistic analysis were calculated using RevMan5.0.17 software. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trails, a total of 2 343 patients were involved. There were significant differences in resection rate [RR=1.12, 95%CI(1.04-1.22)] and 5 year survival rate [RR=1.39, 95%CI(1.15-1.68)] No statistical different in 3 year survival rate [RR=1.18, 95%CI(0.94-1.49)], Time to progression [MD=0.61, 95%CI(-4.87-6.10)] and complications of surgery [RR=1.21, 95%CI(0.83-1.76)]. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery can benefit patients by raising the R0 resection rate and 5 year survival rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?