Abstract:Objective: To assess the effects of pharmacological therapies for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Patients and methods: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases, trial registries, grey literature and conference proceedings with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status. The date of the latest search of all databases was July 2019. We included randomised controlled trials. Inclusion criteria were men with a diagnosis of CP/CPPS. We included all available pharmacological interventions. Two review authors independently classified studies and abstracted data from the included studies, performed statistical analyses and rated quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methods. The primary outcomes were prostatitis symptoms and adverse events. The secondary outcomes were sexual dysfunction, urinary symptoms, quality of life, anxiety and depression. Results: We included 99 unique studies in 9119 men with CP/CPPS, with assessments of 16 types of pharmacological interventions. Most of our comparisons included short-term follow-up information. The median age of the participants was 38 years. Most studies did not specify their funding sources; 21 studies reported funding from pharmaceutical companies. We found low- to very low-quality evidence that α-blockers may reduce prostatitis symptoms based on a reduction in National Institutes of Health - Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) scores of >2 (but <8) with an increased incidence of minor adverse events such as dizziness and hypotension. Moderate- to low-quality evidence indicates that 5α-reductase inhibitors, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and phytotherapy probably cause a small decrease in prostatitis symptoms and may not be associated with a greater incidence of adverse events. Intraprostatic botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection may cause a large reduction in prostatitis symptoms with procedure-related adverse events (haematuria), but pelvic floor muscle BTA injection may not have the same effects (low-quality evidence). Allopurinol may also be ineffective for reducing prostatitis symptoms (low-quality evidence). We assessed a wide range of interventions involving traditional Chinese medicine; low-quality evidence showed they may reduce prostatitis symptoms without an increased incidence in adverse events. Moderate- to high-quality evidence indicates that the following interventions may be ineffective for the reduction of prostatitis symptoms: anticholinergics, Escherichia coli lysate (OM-89), pentosan, and pregabalin. Low- to very low-quality evidence indicates that antidepressants and tanezumab may be ineffective for the reduction of prostatitis symptoms. Low-quality evidence indicates that mepartricin and phosphodiesterase inhibitors may reduce prostatitis symptoms, without an increased incidence in adverse events. Conclusions: Based on the findings of low- to very low-quality evidence, this review found that some pharmacological interventions such as α-blockers may reduce prostatitis symptoms with an increased incidence of minor adverse events such as dizziness and hypotension. Other interventions may cause a reduction in prostatitis symptoms without an increased incidence of adverse events while others were found to be ineffective.

Fluoxetine Ameliorates Symptoms of Refractory Chronic Prostatitis/chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome.

Prostatic Calculi Influence the Antimicrobial Efficacy in Men with Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis

Combination therapy of α -blockers and antidepressive drug for treatment of CP/CPPS

Psychological intervention in treatment of patients with chronic prostatitis

412 Symptoms, Sexual Dysfunction and Psychological Burden in Chinese Men with Chronic Prostatitis/ Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

[Electrophysiological technique for treatment of chronic prostatiti: Curative effect observation]

The Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Chronic Abacterial Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome after Intraprostatic Injection of Chuanshentong

[Clinical efficacy of biofeedback and electrical stimulation combined with prostate massage in the treatment of chronic prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome]

Efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a review of the literature

Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Sham Acupuncture Controlled Trial

The Associations Between Leukocytes in Prostatic Fluid and Symptoms in Men with Inflammatory Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Non-pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a Cochrane systematic review

Efficacy of Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Psychological management of patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS): a systematic review

A Preliminary Evaluation of the Psychometric Profiles in Chinese Men with Chronic Prostatitis/chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

[Correlation of the prognosis of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome with psychological and other factors: a Cox regression analysis].

[Epidemiological Study of Chronic Prostatitis Patients with Depression Symptoms].

Clinical value of NIH consensus classification of chronic pelvic pain syndrome

Combination therapy of non-intrusive ultrasound with integrated Chinese-western medcine for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

[A Clinical Study of Prostat Combined with an Antibiotic for Chronic Nonbacterial Prostatitis].