Abstract:Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis from June 2016 to June 2018. These patients include 33 males and 82 females, ranging in age from 41 to 72 years, with a mean of (57±7) years. 56 cases (posterior interbody fusion group) were treated by intermuscular approach and 59 cases (oblique lateral interbody fusion group) were treated by oblique lateral approach and posterior pedicle screw fixation. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, imaging results, clinical results and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up with an average of (27±3) months (range from 12 to 48 months). The operative time and intraoperative blood loss of oblique lateral interbody fusion group were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (P<0.05). There was no incision infection and nerve injury were observed in two groups. Besides, the VAS score at 72 h after surgery of oblique lateral interbody fusion group (1.10±0.08) were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (1.51±0.15). According to the analysis of variance with repeated measures design, the difference between the posterior group and the oblique lateral fusion group was statistically significant in terms of lumbar lordosis angle and spondylolisthesis rate at postoperation and the last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between different groups in spondylolisthesis angle, sacral inclination angle and intervertebral space height. Both the two groups showed significant improvement in ODI during the final follow-up (P<0.05), but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the posterior fusion group was significantly higher than in the oblique lateral fusion group (P<0.05). The fusion rate of posterior interbody fusion group was 96.4% and 94.9% in oblique lateral interbody fusion group, while the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). During the follow-up, loosening, displacement, breakage of pedicle screw, displacement of intervertebral cages or obvious degeneration of adjacent segments were not observed.Conclusions:The posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and the oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation take well clinical results for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ ). Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation through intermuscular approach takes advantages of quick operation, less trauma, less bleeding, high safety, quick recovery and no interference to spinal canal, which can be a good choice for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).

Lateral position one-stage combined posterioanterior approaches for the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculous spondylitis

Posterior debridement and internal fixation for ultralong segmental tuberculosis in thoracic and lumbar vertebra through cross-window

A Modified Surgical Technique of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

The anatomical characteristics and the analysis to clinical efficacy about modified minimally invasive surgery TILF by muscle space approach and bilateral fixation and unilateral decompression

Clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches in the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a multicenter retrospective case–control study with a minimum 10-year follow-up

One-stage posterior debridement and single-segment interbody fusion for treating mono-segmental lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis in adults following minimum 5-year follow-up

Clinical Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches in Treatment of Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis in Tibet

Comparative study of oblique lateral approach and posterior fusion in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis

[Surgical treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis by anterior debridement,bone graft,and posterior pedicle screw-rod internal fixation]

One-Stage Anterior Approach with Arch Plate to Treat Lumbosacral Tuberculosis

Transforaminal Debridement with a Posterior-Only Approach Involving Placement of an Interbody Bone Graft Combined with Diseased Vertebral Fixation for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis

Surgical Treatment for Spinal Tuberculosis with Bilateral Paraspinal Abscess or Bilateral Psoas Abscess

[Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis with Intraspinal Abscesses by Unilateral Vertebral Lamina Limited Decompression Via Posterior-Only Approach].

One-stage posterior surgery combined with anti-Brucella therapy in the management of lumbosacral brucellosis spondylitis: a retrospective study

Anterior debridement for L3～S1 tuberculosis through the medial edge of the rectus abdominal muscle and retroperitoneal approach

Anterior primary debridement,bone grafting and internal fixation for lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis

Debridement combined with local anti-TB drugs delivery for thoracic and lumbar spine tuberculosis

Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation with single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis

Modified posterior-anterior operation for treatment of serious lumbar fracture and dislocation]

One‐stage Debridement Via Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Corridor Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Spontaneous Lumbar Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Case Series

[Posterior approach to treatment of spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar scoliosis].