Late Sodium Current Contributes To The Reverse Rate-Dependent Effect Of I-Kr Inhibition On Ventricular Repolarization

Lin Wu,Jihua Ma,Hong Li,Chao Wang,Eleonora Grandi,Peihua Zhang,Antao Luo,Donald M Bers,John C Shryock,Luiz Belardinelli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.000661
IF: 37.8
2011-01-01
Circulation
Abstract:Background-The reverse rate dependence (RRD) of actions of I-Kr-blocking drugs to increase the action potential duration (APD) and beat-to-beat variability of repolarization (BVR) of APD is proarrhythmic. We determined whether inhibition of endogenous, physiological late Na+ current (late I-Na) attenuates the RRD and proarrhythmic effect of I-Kr inhibition.Methods and Results-Duration of the monophasic APD (MAPD) was measured from female rabbit hearts paced at cycle lengths from 400 to 2000 milliseconds, and BVR was calculated. In the absence of a drug, duration of monophasic action potential at 90% completion of repolarization (MAPD(90)) and BVR increased as the cycle length was increased from 400 to 2000 milliseconds (n = 36 and 26; P<0.01). Both E-4031 (20 nmol/L) and d-sotalol (10 mu mol/L) increased MAPD(90) and BVR at all stimulation rates, and the increase was greater at slower than at faster pacing rates (n = 19, 11, 12 and 7, respectively; P<0.01). Tetrodotoxin (1 mu mol/L) and ranolazine significantly attenuated the RRD of MAPD90, reduced BVR (P<0.01), and abolished torsade de pointes in hearts treated with either 20 nmol/L E-4031 or 10 mu mol/L d-sotalol. Endogenous late I-Na in cardiomyocytes stimulated at cycle lengths from 500 to 4000 milliseconds was greater at slower than at faster stimulation rates, and rapidly decreased during the first several beats at faster but not at slower rates (n = 8; P<0.01). In a computational model, simulated RRD of APD caused by E-4031 and d-sotalol was attenuated when late I-Na was inhibited.Conclusion-Endogenous late I-Na contributes to the RRD of I-Kr inhibitor-induced increases in APD and BVR and to bradycardia-related ventricular arrhythmias. (Circulation. 2011;123:1713-1720.)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?