Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS), and tissue adhesive injection in the treatment of esophagogastric junctional variceal bleeding, and to provide a reference for reasonable selection of different hemostasis methods. MethodsA total of 1264 patients with liver cirrhosis and esophagogastric junctional variceal bleeding who underwent emergency gastroscopic hemostasis in Beijing Shijitan Hospital and The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019 were enrolled and divided into EVL, EIS, HI groups based on the method of emergency gastroscopic hemostasis. These groups were compared in terms of success rate of operation, success rate of hemostasis, early rebleeding rate, and postoperative complications. The patients were also divided into groups based on bleeding site, and the success rates of different hemostasis methods at different sites were compared. An analysis of variance was used for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. ResultsThe success rate of EIS and tissue adhesive injection was significantly higher than that of EVL, and the success rate of EIS was significantly higher than that of tissue adhesive injection (χ2=75.01, P＜0.05). Tissue adhesive injection had a significantly higher success rate of hemostasis than EVL and EIS (χ2=9.885, P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in early rebleeding rate between groups (χ2=0.29，P=0.865). The patients undergoing EVL had a significantly higher incidence rate of aspiration and pneumonia than those undergoing EIS or tissue adhesive injection (χ2=19.08, P＜0.05); the patients undergoing tissue adhesive injection had a significantly higher proportion of patients with postoperative pyrexia than those undergoing EVL or EIS (χ2=23.94, P＜005); the patients undergoing EVL or tissue adhesive injection had a significantly higher incidence rate of postoperative retrosternal discomfort than those undergoing EIS (χ2=19.56, P＜0.05). EIS and EVL had a high success rate of hemostasis for the bleeding sites at 1-5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ); EIS and tissue adhesive injection had a similar success rate of hemostasis for the bleeding sites from 1 cm above the EGJ to 2 cm below the EGJ; tissue adhesive injection had a high success rate of hemostasis for the bleeding sites at 2-5 cm below the EGJ. ConclusionEVL, EIS, and tissue adhesive injection are effective methods for the treatment of esophagogastric junctional variceal bleeding, and the selection of hemostasis method based on the location of bleeding site can improve the outcome of hemostasis.

Efficacy of Sequential Therapy of Endoscopic Tissue Adhesive Injection with Variceal Ligation for Esophagogastric Varices

Esophageal Variceal Ligation Monotherapy Versus Combined Ligation and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Esophageal Varices.

A retrospective analysis of the efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation versus endoscopic tissue adhesive injection in the treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding

Influence of follow-up treatment compliance on prognosis after endoscopic gastroesophageal varices treatment

Risk Factors for Predicting Early Variceal Rebleeding after Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation combined with partial splenic embolization for the treatment of esophageal varices

Short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection of low dose of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate injection for type GOV1 gastric varices combined with endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices

Clinical evaluation of different modalities in emergency endoscopic treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding

Clinical effect of emergency gastroscopic ligation,sclerotherapy,and tissue adhesive injection in treatment of esopha-gogastric junctional variceal bleeding

Endoscopic selective varices devascularization: effects of once endotherapy for esophageal and gastric varices

[Use of Endoscopic Tissue Adhesive Injection for Gastric Varices].

A retrospective comparative study of histoacryl injection and banding ligation in the treatment of acute type 1 gastric variceal hemorrhage

Modified ‘sandwich’ injection with or without ligation for variceal bleeding in patients with both esophageal and gastric varices: a retrospective cohort study

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of bleeding from mild to moderate gastric varices type 1

Influencing Factors and Efficacy of Endoscopic Tissue Adhesives Injection in Preventing Esophageal Gastric Varices Bleeding

Esophageal variceal ligation plus sclerotherapy vs. ligation alone for the treatment of esophageal varices

Gastric Variceal Obstruction Improves the Efficacy of Endoscopic Management of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding in GOV Type I

Effect of endoscopic therapy and drug therapy on prognosis and rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding

Long-term Efficacy of Endoscopic Ligation Plus Cyanoacrylate Injection with or Without Sclerotherapy for Variceal Bleeding.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of emergency endoscopic variceal ligation plus octreotide in the treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients]

Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic ligation with or without sclerotherapy for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.