Comparison of semen quality and outcome of assisted reproductive techniques in Chinese men with and without hepatitis B.

Xu-Ping Zhou,Xiao-Ling Hu,Yi-Min Zhu,Fan Qu,Sai-Jun Sun,Yu-Li Qian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.164
2011-01-01
Asian Journal of Andrology
Abstract:In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on sperm quality and the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART). A total of 916 men (457 HBV-positive and 459 HBV-negative) seeking fertility assistance from January 2008 to December 2009 at the Women's Hospital in the School of Medicine at Zhejiang University were analysed for semen parameters. Couples in which the men were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-seropositive were categorized as HBV-positive and included 587 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and 325 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles from January 2004 to December 2009; negative controls were matched for female age, date of ova retrieval, ART approach used (IVF or ICSI) and randomized in a ratio of 1:1 according to the ART treatment cycles (587 for IVF and 325 for ICSI). HBV-infected men exhibited lower semen volume, lower total sperm count as well as poor sperm motility and morphology (P < 0.05) when compared to control individuals. Rates of two-pronuclear (2PN) fertilisation, high-grade embryo acquisition, implantation and clinical pregnancy were also lower among HBV-positive patients compared to those of HBV-negative patients after ICSI and embryo transfer (P < 0.05); IVF outcomes were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that HBV infection independently contributed to increased rates of asthenozoospermia and oligozoospermia/azoospermia (P < 0.05) as well as decreased rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy in ICSI cycles (P < 0.05). Our results suggest that HBV infection in men is associated with poor sperm quality and worse ICSI and embryo transfer outcomes but does not affect the outcome of IVF and embryo transfer. Asian Journal of Andrology (2011) 13, 465-469; doi:10.1038/aja.2010.164; published online 14 March 2011
What problem does this paper attempt to address?