Changes in the level of micro RNA-206 gene expression in patients with type I bipolar disorder before and after treatment and comparison with a control population

WANG Zuowei,LI Zezhi,WANG Lingxiao,WU Zhiguo,YUAN Chengmei,HONG Wu,YU Shunying,FANG Yiru
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2011.05.003
2011-01-01
Abstract:Micro RNA-206(miRNA-206) is a potential biomarker of bipolar disorder that has not yet been fully investigated.Objective:Assess the relationship between the level of miRNA-206 in peripheral blood and the clinical state of patients in the manic phase of bipolar disorder.Methods:Thirty-six newly admitted patients in the manic phase of type I bipolar disorder (diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis I disorders) and 30 age and gender matched healthy controls were enrolled.miRNA-206 levels in peripheral blood lymphocytes were assessed at the time of enrollment in control subjects and at baseline and at the end of the second,fourth and eighth week of treatment in the patient group.The severity of manic symptoms in the patient group was evaluated at the same time as the miRNA-206 assessments using the Young Mania Rating Scale.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in baseline miRNA-206 levels between patients and controls (Z=-0.02,P =0.988) or,in the patient group,between baseline levels and those at the end of the second ( Z =-0.17,P =0.864),fourth ( Z =-0.86,P =0.392) and eighth ( Z =-1.29,P =0.197) weeks after initiating treatment.There were also no statistically significant correlations between the miRNA-206 level and the severity of manic symptoms at any of the four time points ( rs =0.13,P =0.518; rs =0.12,P =0.532; rs =-0.18,P =0.361 ;and rs =0.02,P=0.912; respectively).Conclusion:The activity of miRNA-206 in peripherally blood lymphocytes does not appear to be a biomarker of type I bipolar disorder or a biomarker for treatment efficacy during the treatment of a manic episode.But the power to detect differences between patients and controls in the study was only 22% so further research with larger samples ( possibly using different techniques to assess miRNA-206 activity) are needed to confirm these findings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?