Abstract:Purpose: We compared gene expression signatures in tree shrew sclera produced by three different visual conditions that all produce ocular elongation and myopia: minus-lens wear, form deprivation, and dark treatment. Methods: Six groups of tree shrews (n = 7 per group) were used. Starting 24 days after normal eye-opening (days of visual experience [DVE]), two minus-lens groups wore a monocular -5 diopter (D) lens for 2 days (ML-2) or 4 days (ML-4); two form-deprivation groups wore a monocular translucent diffuser for 2 days (FD-2) or 4 days (FD-4). A dark-treatment (DK) group was placed in continuous darkness for 11 days after experiencing a light/dark environment until 17 DVE. A normal colony-reared group was examined at 28 DVE. Quantitative PCR was used to measure the relative differences in mRNA levels for 55 candidate genes in the sclera that were selected, either because they showed differential expression changes in previous ML studies or because a whole-transcriptome analysis suggested they would change during myopia development. Results: The treated eyes in all groups responded with a significant myopic shift, indicating that the myopia was actively progressing. In the ML-2 group, 27 genes were significantly downregulated in the treated eyes, relative to control eyes. In the treated eyes of the FD-2 group, 16 of the same genes also were significantly downregulated and one was upregulated. The two gene expression patterns were significantly correlated (r(2) = 0.90, P < 0.001). After 4 days of treatment, 31 genes were significantly downregulated in the treated eyes of the ML-4 group and three were upregulated. Twenty-nine of the same genes (26 down- and 3 up-regulated) and six additional genes (all downregulated) were significantly affected in the FD-4 group. The response patterns were highly correlated (r(2) = 0.95, P < 0.001). When the DK group (mean of right and left eyes) was compared to the control eyes of the ML-4 group, the direction and magnitude of the gene expression patterns were similar to those of the ML-4 (r(2) = 0.82, P < 0.001, excluding PENK). Similar patterns also were found when the treated eyes of the ML-4, FD-4, and DK groups were compared to the age-matched normal eyes. Conclusions: The very similar gene expression signatures produced in the sclera by the three different myopiagenic visual conditions at different time points suggests that there is a "scleral remodeling signature" in this mammal, closely related to primates. The scleral genes examined did not distinguish between the specific visual stimuli that initiate the signaling cascade that results in axial elongation and myopia.

Selective Breeding For Susceptibility To Myopia Reveals A Gene-Environment Interaction

Pre-treatment choroidal thickness is not predictive of susceptibility to form-deprivation myopia in chickens.

Quantile regression analysis reveals widespread evidence for gene-environment or gene-gene interactions in myopia development

Do differentially expressed genes explain high myopia in congenital stationary night blindness?

Childhood gene-environment interactions and age-dependent effects of genetic variants associated with refractive error and myopia: The CREAM Consortium

Investigating the Relationship Between UMODL1 Gene Polymorphisms and High Myopia: a Case–control Study in Chinese

Insight from OPN1LW Gene Haplotypes into the Cause and Prevention of Myopia

Gene–environment interaction in myopia

Association of 10 Genetic Variations and 10 Environmental Factors with Myopia of Different Severities in Different Age Groups of People in Northeast China

Gene-environment Interaction in Spherical Equivalent and Myopia: An Evidence-based Review

Scleral HIF-1α is a Prominent Regulatory Candidate for Genetic and Environmental Interactions in Human Myopia Pathogenesis

Ambient Light Regulates Retinal Dopamine Signaling and Myopia Susceptibility

Transcriptome-based insights into gene networks controlling myopia prevention

When Do Myopia Genes Have Their Effect? Comparison of Genetic Risks Between Children and Adults.

Myopia Genetics and Heredity

Genetic Deletion Of The Adenosine A(2a) Receptor Confers Postnatal Development Of Relative Myopia In Mice

Genome-wide analysis points to roles for extracellular matrix remodeling, the visual cycle, and neuronal development in myopia

Diurnal gene expression patterns in retina and choroid distinguish myopia progression from myopia onset

Establishment and comprehensive characterization of a novel dark-reared zebrafish model for myopia studies

Gene expression signatures in tree shrew sclera in response to three myopiagenic conditions

Diurnal retinal and choroidal gene expression patterns support a role for circadian biology in myopia pathogenesis