Abstract:This paper is inclined to propose a kind of quantitative structure efficiency technology for toxicity analysis in hoping to predict the toxicity of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and its toxic threatening degrees.The technology is mainly used to forecast or predict the air-octanol partition coefficient of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and its carcinogenicity.Therefore,the so-called quantitative structure activity relationship(QSAR) the paper has referred to should consist of the molecule descriptors and the experimental data.In the paper,we have established the models by adopting the supporting vector machine algorithm(SVM) and the artificial neural network algorithm(ANN).And,in terms of the MATLAB,we have established the KoA regression forecasting model of PAHs and the prediction model for classifying the carcinogenicity of the PAHs under way.Furthermore,we have managed to use the grid division(GS) method,the genetic algorithm (GA) and the particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) to optimize the parameters of SVM,accordingly.The verification and evaluation of the models are supposed to be achieved through the validation of the internal and external parameters.And,then,the KoA regression forecast result of PAHs can further be evaluated by means of R2 and MSE,whereas the classifi.cation accuracy can be used to test the results whether the carcinogenicity classification evaluation of PAHs proves effective or not.Moreover,the regression forecast may result in that the gained MSE of SVM ought to be less than MSE of ANN,while R2 of SVM should be bigger than R2 of ANN.In the result of classification prediction,the classification accuracy of SVM should be greater than that of ANN.Mter the optimization of the regression prediction,GS and PSO should increase R2 of the original model but decrease the MSE of the original model.However,GA may turn to be over the fitting phenomenon and result in that the MSE of the best regression prediction model may be:GS-SVR is 0.059 7 with R2 being 0.913 0.Thus,the classification accuracy of the three models should be greater than that of the original one on average on the condition that the classification prediction has been optimized.Therefore,the best classification model can produce a classification precision as high as GA-SVC is 95％.The results of our experiments show that the stability and the predictive power of the two models offered by SVM can be better than those of ANN,whereas SVM can heighten the stability and the predictive ability of the original model through parameter optimization.

Use of support vector machine to predict the toxicity of aromatic compounds

A novel tree kernel support vector machine classifier for modeling the relationship between bioactivity and molecular descriptors

Application of support vector machine (SVM) for prediction toxic activity of different data sets

Prediction of the Aquatic Toxicity of Aromatic Compounds to Tetrahymena Pyriformis Through Support Vector Regression

Predicting the Androgenicity of Structurally Diverse Compounds from Molecular Structure Using Different Classifiers

In Silico Toxicity Prediction by Support Vector Machine and SMILES Representation-Based String Kernel.

QSAR study on applying support vector machine to binding affinity of Ah receptor with aromatic compounds

Accurate Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity of Aromatic Compounds Based on Genetic Algorithm and Least Squares Support Vector Machines

Using Support Vector Regression Coupled with the Genetic Algorithm for Predicting Acute Toxicity to the Fathead Minnow

Quantitative structure-activity forecast of the PAHs toxicity by using the supporting vector machine

Support vector machine: classifying and predicting mutagenicity of complex mixtures based on pollution profiles.

Comparative Study of Qsar/Qspr Correlations Using Support Vector Machines, Radial Basis Function Neural Networks, and Multiple Linear Regression

QSAR Study on Phenol Derivatives Toxicity Based on Support Vector Machine

Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks

Prediction of Chemical Carcinogenicity by Machine Learning Approaches.

Support Vector Machine Method Applied to Predict the Toxicity of Halogeno Benzene and Phenol Derivatives

SVM Model for Predicting Carcinogenicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Derivatives

In Silico Toxicity Prediction of Chemicals from EPA Toxicity Database by Kernel Fusion-Based Support Vector Machines

In Silico Prediction of Tetrahymena Pyriformis Toxicity for Diverse Industrial Chemicals with Substructure Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning Methods

Support Vector Machine (SVM) as Alternative Tool to Assign Acute Aquatic Toxicity Warning Labels to Chemicals

An Explainable Supervised Machine Learning Model for Predicting Respiratory Toxicity of Chemicals Using Optimal Molecular Descriptors