Abstract:Background Moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris, which is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, seriously impacts millions of people. However, traditional therapies may cause severe adverse reactions that are unacceptable to many patients, thus limiting the further application of these therapies. Novel therapeutic approaches to effectively treat moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris with minimal adverse reactions are urgently needed. In this retrospective study, we investigated the efficacy and adverse reactions of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 560–1200 nm followed by 420–1200 nm broadband light (BBL). Methods Twenty-four patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris were included in the study and all patients expressed a strong desire for beauty. After aminolevulinic acid (ALA) gel applied, the entire face was sequentially irradiated by using BBL with a 560 nm cut-off filter (560–1200 nm), followed by BBL with a 420 nm cut-off filter (420–1200 nm). The clinical efficacy was evaluated by the proportion of patients achieving cured response and excellent response (effective rate), based on the percentage of lesions reduction (treatment rate). The fluorescent images and photographs of acne vulgaris were recorded. Pain and other common local adverse reactions during the treatment were also recorded and evaluated. Results In patients with moderate acne, the mean treatment rates were 57.74 ± 16.40 (%) and 87.40 ± 8.521 (%) at the 6th week and 12th week of treatment, respectively. In patients with severe acne, the mean treatment rates were 60.95 ± 12.06 (%) and 85.04 ± 9.115 (%) at the 6th week and 12th week of treatment, respectively. At the 6th and 12th weeks of treatment, the effective rates of patients were 20.00 % and 93.33 % in patients with moderate acne, and 0.000 % and 88.89 % in patients with severe acne, respectively. Pain scores were significantly higher in patients with severe acne compared to patients with moderate acne when receiving 560–1200 nm BBL-PDT. Additionally, patients when receiving 420–1200 nm BBL-PDT exhibited significantly higher pain scores than those when receiving 560–1200 nm BBL-PDT. The degree of erythema was more severe in patients with severe acne than in those with moderate acne. The pigmentation was observed in one patient with moderate acne and one patient with severe acne. Conclusion The 560–1200 nm and 420–1200 nm BBL-PDT therapy can effectively treat moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris with tolerable adverse reactions, providing a new option for patients with higher esthetic requirements.

Phototherapy for mild to moderate acne vulgaris with portable blue and red led

Blue LED Phototherapy for Treating Acne

Safety and Effectiveness of a New Blue Light Device for the Self-treatment of Mild-to-moderate Acne

Comparison of blue laser and red light-emitting diode-mediated aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy for moderate and severe acne vulgaris: a prospective, split-face, nonrandomized controlled study

[Blue Light Source in Phototherapy]

Combination of red/blue light phototherapy and Chinese medicinal liniment pourmask in the treatment of acne

Phototherapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris: what is its role?

5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy using 560-1200 nm followed by 420-1200 nm broadband light in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne

Utilization of light-emitting diodes for skin therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Investigate the Values of the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris with Redlight and Bluelight

Light therapies for acne: abridged Cochrane systematic review including GRADE assessments

A chlorin e6 derivative-mediated photodynamic therapy for mild to moderate acne: A prospective, single-blind, randomized, split-face controlled study

Light/laser therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris

Long-Term Improvement of Different Types of Acne Vulgaris Using a Mild Photodynamic Therapy Protocol with BF-200 ALA Gel: A Series of Cases

Treatment of Inflammatory Facial Acne Vulgaris in Chinese Patients with the 1450-Nm Diode Laser: A Pilot Study

Conventional versus daylight photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris: A randomized and prospective clinical study in China

Optimal blue light irradiation conditions for the treatment of acne vulgaris in a mouse model

Therapeutic effect and follow-up analysis of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe acne

Study of different pre-treatments in the comparison of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for moderate to severe acne vulgaris

Treatment of inflammatory facial acne vulgaris with combination 595-nm pulsed-dye laser with dynamic-cooling-device and 1,450-nm diode laser

Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Versus Topical Erythromycin 2% in the Treatment of Inflammatory Acne Vulgaris