Comparison of the performance of four types of liner systems in China

谢海建,詹良通,陈云敏,楼章华

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2011.07.004

2011-01-01

Abstract:Four types of landfill liner systems were compared in terms of leakage rate,mass concentration,and contaminant breakthrough time.One is 2 m-thick compacted clay liner（CCL,and the other three are composite liners consisting of geomembrane and CCL or geosynthetic clay liner（GCL）.The analyses employed a one-dimensional analytical model for analyzing contaminant transport through defects in the geomembrane component of composite liners and diffusion of volatile organic compounds through intact composite liners.Cadmium and benzene were used to represent inorganic and organic leachate constituents.The composite liner with a GCL had the lowest leakage rate of the four liner systems,while the 2m-thick CCL had the largest leakage rate.GCL composite liner provides the best barrier for inorganic contaminant,especially for the case of high leachate level and poor interface contact of composite liner.The thicker CCL is the best barrier for the volatile organic contaminants.The breakthrough time of CCL for benzene is 2 to 3 orders of magnitude greater than that of GCL composite liner.The performance of the CCL composite liner is much better than the single compacted clay liner when the leachate level in the landfill is relatively high（e.g.,more than 10 m）.The 100-year concentration at the bottom of CCL composite liner is approximately 10 times lower than that of 2 m CCL.The single geomembrane liner is not suitable for landfill liner system.The construction quality of the composite liner and the leachate level in the landfill should be strictly controlled.