Spatiotemporal Assessments on the Satellite‐Based Precipitation Products from Fengyun and GPM over the Yunnan‐Kweichow Plateau, China
Hanyu Lu,Leiding Ding,Ziqiang Ma,Hongyi Li,Tianjian Lu,Manli Su,Jintao Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019ea000857
IF: 3.68
2020-01-01
Earth and Space Science
Abstract:AbstractHigh‐quality precipitation data are vital for hydrological applications and climate change research. In this study, we evaluated two satellite‐based precipitation products from Chinese Fengyun (FY) 2G (G is one of the third batch of operational geostationary satellites in the Chinese FY‐2 series) and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) against the rain gauge‐based precipitation data, respectively, over the Yunnan‐Kweichow Plateau, China, at different temporal scales (e.g., monthly, daily, and hourly). And the main findings of this study were as follows: (1) FY2G Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) and Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) shared similar spatial precipitation patterns with those of rain gauge data, while the FY2G QPE general underestimated the precipitation (bias, −30%–0%), and IMERG obviously overestimated the precipitation (bias, 0%–60%) at monthly scale over the Yunnan‐Kweichow Plateau; (2) the FY2G QPE correlated significantly better (Correlation coefficient, CC, ~0.80) than IMERG (CC ~0.20) against rain gauge data at daily scale, meanwhile, the average daily bias value of IMERG (~30%) was around 6 times larger than that of FY2G QPE (~5%); (3) The FY2G QPE (CC ~0.7, bias ~ − 8%, root‐mean‐square error ~2.0 mm/hr, mean absolute error ~ 0.6 mm/hr) also generally outperformed the IMERG (CC ~0.1, bias ~13%, root‐mean‐square error ~3.0 mm/hr, mean absolute error ~ 1.0 mm/hr), at hourly scale; (4) The FY2G QPE significantly underestimated the precipitation in the period between 16:00 and 20:00 with the probability of detection (POD) decreased from 0.8 to 0.5, while the IMERG significantly overestimated the precipitation in the period between 4:00 and 12:00, at diurnal scale; and (5) one of the reasons resulting the significant overestimations of IMERG might due to its weak abilities in detecting the precipitation events with POD ~0.2 and false alarm ratio (FAR) ~0.7 at diurnal scale, which performed worse than those of the FY2G QPE (POD ~0.8 and FAR ~0.4). These findings would provide valuable recommendations for using these satellite‐based precipitation products in various application fields, such as hydrology, agriculture, and meteorology over the YKP, and also for improving the algorithms of GPM.